Suppr超能文献

使用人工神经网络预测活动性肺结核

Predicting active pulmonary tuberculosis using an artificial neural network.

作者信息

El-Solh A A, Hsiao C B, Goodnough S, Serghani J, Grant B J

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Erie County Medical Center, Buffalo, NY 14215, USA.

出版信息

Chest. 1999 Oct;116(4):968-73. doi: 10.1378/chest.116.4.968.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Nosocomial outbreaks of tuberculosis (TB) have been attributed to unrecognized pulmonary TB. Accurate assessment in identifying index cases of active TB is essential in preventing transmission of the disease.

OBJECTIVES

To develop an artificial neural network using clinical and radiographic information to predict active pulmonary TB at the time of presentation at a health-care facility that is superior to physicians' opinion.

DESIGN

Nonconcurrent prospective study.

SETTING

University-affiliated hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

A derivation group of 563 isolation episodes and a validation group of 119 isolation episodes.

INTERVENTIONS

A general regression neural network (GRNN) was used to develop the predictive model.

MEASUREMENTS

Predictive accuracy of the neural network compared with clinicians' assessment.

RESULTS

Predictive accuracy was assessed by the c-index, which is equivalent to the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. The GRNN significantly outperformed the physicians' prediction, with calculated c-indices (+/- SEM) of 0.947 +/- 0.028 and 0.61 +/- 0.045, respectively (p < 0.001). When the GRNN was applied to the validation group, the corresponding c-indices were 0. 923 +/- 0.056 and 0.716 +/- 0.095, respectively.

CONCLUSION

An artificial neural network can identify patients with active pulmonary TB more accurately than physicians' clinical assessment.

摘要

背景

医院内结核病(TB)暴发被归因于未被识别的肺结核。准确评估活动性结核病的索引病例对于预防疾病传播至关重要。

目的

利用临床和影像学信息开发一种人工神经网络,以在医疗保健机构就诊时预测活动性肺结核,且优于医生的判断。

设计

非同期前瞻性研究。

地点

大学附属医院。

参与者

一个由563次隔离事件组成的推导组和一个由119次隔离事件组成的验证组。

干预措施

使用广义回归神经网络(GRNN)建立预测模型。

测量指标

将神经网络的预测准确性与临床医生的评估进行比较。

结果

预测准确性通过c指数评估,其等同于受试者操作特征曲线下的面积。GRNN的表现显著优于医生的预测,计算出的c指数(±标准误)分别为0.947±0.028和0.61±0.045(p<0.001)。当将GRNN应用于验证组时,相应的c指数分别为0.923±0.056和0.716±0.095。

结论

人工神经网络比医生的临床评估能更准确地识别活动性肺结核患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验