• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

婴儿鼻咽部抽吸:有益吗?

Infant nasal-pharyngeal suctioning: is it beneficial?

作者信息

Czarnecki M L, Kaucic C L

机构信息

Children's Hospital of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, USA.

出版信息

Pediatr Nurs. 1999 Mar-Apr;25(2):193-6, 218.

PMID:10532015
Abstract

PURPOSE

To identify and validate the indicators registered nurses (RNs) use when deciding whether or not infants experiencing respiratory illnesses require nasal pharyngeal (NP) suctioning.

METHOD

The first part of this study involved 43 RNs completing a questionnaire that examined the assessment parameters RNs use in determining when to perform NP suctioning. The second part of this study involved assessing infants' respiratory status before and after NP suctioning to determine what, if anything, changed post suctioning.

FINDINGS

The three assessment parameters most frequently used by nurses in determining the need for suctioning were pulse oximeter readings, visible secretions, and audible secretions. The only three parameters to show statistically significant improvement post suctioning were pulse oximeter readings, visible secretions, and audible secretions.

CONCLUSIONS

Nurses are using valid assessment parameters when determining the need for infant NP suctioning, and NP suctioning does improve certain aspects of infants' respiratory status. There are presumed benefits to NP suctioning. However, there are also potential risks. Nasal-pharyngeal suctioning can produce bradycardia, laryngospasm, cardiac dysrhythmias, and edema and trauma to mucous membranes (Oberc, 1991), tachycardia, emotional distress, bronchospasm, and cardiac arrest (Young, 1988). The procedure involves inserting a catheter into an infant's nose and advancing it to the back of the throat (pharynx) approximately 4-8 cm (Oberc, 1991). Once at the pharynx, suction is intermittently applied and the catheter is slowly removed. The purpose of NP suctioning is to clear the airway of an infant who is unable to do so independently. However, the effectiveness and outcomes of this procedure have not been supported by research.

摘要

目的

识别并验证注册护士(RN)在决定患有呼吸道疾病的婴儿是否需要进行鼻咽(NP)抽吸时所使用的指标。

方法

本研究的第一部分涉及43名注册护士填写一份问卷,该问卷调查了注册护士在确定何时进行NP抽吸时所使用的评估参数。本研究的第二部分涉及在NP抽吸前后评估婴儿的呼吸状态,以确定抽吸后是否有任何变化。

结果

护士在确定是否需要抽吸时最常使用的三个评估参数是脉搏血氧饱和度读数、可见分泌物和可闻分泌物。抽吸后显示有统计学显著改善的仅有的三个参数是脉搏血氧饱和度读数、可见分泌物和可闻分泌物。

结论

护士在确定婴儿是否需要进行NP抽吸时使用了有效的评估参数,并且NP抽吸确实改善了婴儿呼吸状态的某些方面。NP抽吸可能存在益处。然而,也存在潜在风险。鼻咽抽吸可导致心动过缓、喉痉挛、心律失常以及黏膜水肿和创伤(奥伯茨,1991年)、心动过速、情绪困扰、支气管痉挛和心脏骤停(扬,1988年)。该操作包括将一根导管插入婴儿鼻腔并推进至咽喉后部(咽部)约4 - 8厘米处(奥伯茨,1991年)。到达咽部后,间歇性地施加吸力并缓慢抽出导管。NP抽吸的目的是清理无法自行清理气道的婴儿的气道。然而,该操作的有效性和结果尚未得到研究支持。

相似文献

1
Infant nasal-pharyngeal suctioning: is it beneficial?婴儿鼻咽部抽吸:有益吗?
Pediatr Nurs. 1999 Mar-Apr;25(2):193-6, 218.
2
An observational study on the open-system endotracheal suctioning practices of critical care nurses.一项关于重症护理护士开放式气管内吸痰操作的观察性研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2008 Feb;17(3):360-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.01990.x.
3
Nasal continuous positive airway pressure: a multisite study of suctioning practices within NICUs.经鼻持续气道正压通气:新生儿重症监护病房吸痰操作的多中心研究
Adv Neonatal Care. 2013 Apr;13(2):E1-9. doi: 10.1097/ANC.0b013e3182863eaf.
4
Clinical judgments about endotracheal suctioning: what cues do expert pediatric critical care nurses consider?关于气管内吸痰的临床判断:儿科重症监护专家护士会考虑哪些线索?
Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 2005 Dec;17(4):329-40, ix. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2005.08.002.
5
Endotracheal suctioning: time-worn ritual or timely intervention?气管内吸痰:是陈旧的惯例还是及时的干预措施?
Am J Crit Care. 1995 Mar;4(2):100-5.
6
A comparison of two airway suctioning frequencies in mechanically ventilated, very-low-birthweight infants.机械通气的极低出生体重儿两种气道吸引频率的比较。
Respir Care. 2001 Aug;46(8):783-8.
7
Nasopharyngeal suction study reveals knowledge deficit.鼻咽部吸引术研究揭示了知识匮乏问题。
Nurs Times. 1995;91(50):28-30.
8
Suctioning techniques for the removal of respiratory secretions.用于清除呼吸道分泌物的吸痰技术。
Nurs Stand. 2003;18(9):47-53; quiz 54-5. doi: 10.7748/ns2003.11.18.9.47.c3504.
9
A comprehensive review of pediatric endotracheal suctioning: Effects, indications, and clinical practice.小儿气管内吸引的全面综述:效果、适应证及临床实践
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2008 Sep;9(5):465-77. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e31818499cc.
10
Do postsuctioning transcutaneous PO2 values change when a neonate's movements are restrained?当新生儿的活动受到限制时,吸痰后的经皮氧分压值会发生变化吗?
J Perinatol. 1992 Dec;12(4):333-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Routine oro/nasopharyngeal suction versus no suction at birth.出生时常规口/鼻咽吸引与不进行吸引的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 18;4(4):CD010332. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010332.pub2.
2
Successful treatment of persistent hypoxemia by nasal suctioning in a neonate with primary ciliary dyskinesia.通过鼻腔吸引成功治疗一名患有原发性纤毛运动障碍的新生儿的持续性低氧血症。
J Clin Neonatol. 2012 Apr;1(2):98-100. doi: 10.4103/2249-4847.96774.