Gruber A, Berlit J, Speth C, Lass-Flörl C, Kofler G, Nagl M, Borg-von Zepelin M, Dierich M P, Würzner R
Institute for Hygiene, University of Innsbruck, and Ludwig-Bolzmann Institute for AIDS Research, Austria.
Immunobiology. 1999 Sep;201(1):133-44. doi: 10.1016/S0171-2985(99)80052-7.
The secreted aspartyl proteinase (Sap) of Candida albicans, which is believed to represent an important virulence factor of this opportunistic yeast, and the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) protease, which is obligatory for the production of infectious virions, both belong to the same family of aspartyl proteinases. We have previously shown that the HIV-1 protease inhibitor Indinavir directly inhibits secretion and proteinase activity of Sap in a dose-dependent manner. Furthermore, at very high concentrations, viability of C. albicans is markedly reduced by Indinavir, indicating that HIV-1 protease inhibitors may possess antifungal activity. We thus proposed that these drugs may add to the resolution of mucosal candidiasis in HIV-1 infected subjects. We have now compared three different HIV-1 protease inhibitors. The rank order of Sap inhibition, already significant at 0.1 mg/ml for all protease inhibitors, was Ritonavir > Indinavir > Saquinavir. However, the cross-reactivity of Ritonavir to pepsin was also more pronounced compared with the other two. Indinavir did not affect Candida viability at concentrations up to 1 mg/ml, in line with our previous study. In contrast, at this concentration Saquinavir was even fungicidal as assessed by three different viability assays (colony formation assay, MTT assay, propidium iodide staining) whereas Ritonavir significantly affected the mitochondrial activity only (MTT assay). No influence on Candida viability was observed for any of the three at concentrations of 0.1 mg/ml or lower. It remains to be examined whether HIV-1 protease inhibitors or derivatives thereof may be suitable for in vivo therapy of subjects suffering from mucosal candidiasis resistant to current antimycotics.
白色念珠菌分泌的天冬氨酸蛋白酶(Sap)被认为是这种机会性酵母的一种重要毒力因子,而1型人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV-1)蛋白酶是产生有感染性病毒粒子所必需的,二者都属于天冬氨酸蛋白酶家族。我们之前已经表明,HIV-1蛋白酶抑制剂茚地那韦能以剂量依赖的方式直接抑制Sap的分泌和蛋白酶活性。此外,在非常高的浓度下,茚地那韦能显著降低白色念珠菌的活力,这表明HIV-1蛋白酶抑制剂可能具有抗真菌活性。因此我们提出,这些药物可能有助于解决HIV-1感染患者的黏膜念珠菌病。我们现在比较了三种不同的HIV-1蛋白酶抑制剂。对于所有蛋白酶抑制剂,在0.1mg/ml时对Sap的抑制作用就已很显著,其抑制作用的强弱顺序为:利托那韦>茚地那韦>沙奎那韦。然而,与其他两种药物相比,利托那韦对胃蛋白酶的交叉反应性也更明显。与我们之前的研究一致,茚地那韦在浓度高达1mg/ml时不影响念珠菌的活力。相比之下,在这个浓度下,通过三种不同的活力测定法(菌落形成测定法、MTT测定法、碘化丙啶染色法)评估,沙奎那韦甚至具有杀真菌作用,而利托那韦仅显著影响线粒体活性(MTT测定法)。在浓度为0.1mg/ml或更低时,未观察到这三种药物中的任何一种对念珠菌活力有影响。对于患有对当前抗真菌药物耐药的黏膜念珠菌病的患者,HIV-1蛋白酶抑制剂或其衍生物是否适合体内治疗仍有待研究。