• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

公众可获取的除颤:自动体外除颤器应放置在何处?

Public-access defibrillation: where do we place the AEDs?

作者信息

Gratton M, Lindholm D J, Campbell J P

机构信息

University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine and Department of Emergency Medicine, Truman Medical Center 64108, USA.

出版信息

Prehosp Emerg Care. 1999 Oct-Dec;3(4):303-5. doi: 10.1080/10903129908958958.

DOI:10.1080/10903129908958958
PMID:10534029
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Many prehospital cardiac arrests occur in public places. Even the best EMS systems have a finite response time. Therefore, it has been recommended that automated external defibrillators (AEDs) be placed in public areas for immediate access by trained members of the general public.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the locations of multiple cardiac arrests in order to plan for placement of public-access AEDs.

METHODS

Retrospective review of all primary cardiac arrests in calendar year 1997. Cardiac arrests in which resuscitation was not attempted (DOA), traumatic cases, pediatric cases, and those due to "other" causes were excluded. Location of the cardiac arrest was obtained from the ambulance run ticket. The EMS system is an urban, Midwestern, all-ALS, public-utility model system with fire department first responders that transports approximately 58,000 patients annually.

RESULTS

There was scene response to 922 cardiac arrests. 377 DOAs and 219 nonprimary cardiac arrests were excluded. There were 326 primary cardiac arrests. Sixteen locations had more than one cardiac arrest: 11 locations had two cardiac arrests, four locations had three cardiac arrests, and one location had four cardiac arrests. The airport, an airline overhaul facility, a casino, and two hotels each had two cardiac arrests; the other locations of multiple cardiac arrests were in nursing homes. The professional sports stadiums had no cardiac arrests.

CONCLUSIONS

Since very few locations had more than one cardiac arrest, it may be difficult to identify high-yield public places in which to place an AED. Nursing homes may want to consider AED availability.

摘要

背景

许多院外心脏骤停发生在公共场所。即使是最好的急救医疗服务(EMS)系统也有有限的响应时间。因此,有人建议在公共场所放置自动体外除颤器(AED),以便受过训练的普通公众能够立即获取。

目的

确定多次心脏骤停的地点,以便规划公众可使用的AED的放置位置。

方法

回顾性分析1997年全年所有原发性心脏骤停病例。排除未尝试复苏(到达现场已死亡)的心脏骤停、创伤病例、儿科病例以及由“其他”原因导致的病例。心脏骤停的位置从救护车出车单中获取。该EMS系统是一个位于中西部的城市、全高级生命支持(ALS)、公用事业模式系统,由消防部门作为第一响应者,每年运送约58000名患者。

结果

对922例心脏骤停进行了现场响应。排除377例到达现场已死亡病例和219例非原发性心脏骤停病例。有326例原发性心脏骤停。16个地点发生了不止一次心脏骤停:11个地点发生了两次心脏骤停,4个地点发生了三次心脏骤停,1个地点发生了四次心脏骤停。机场、一家航空公司检修设施、一家赌场和两家酒店各发生了两次心脏骤停;多次心脏骤停的其他地点在养老院。专业体育场没有发生心脏骤停。

结论

由于很少有地点发生不止一次心脏骤停,可能难以确定放置AED的高收益公共场所。养老院可能需要考虑配备AED。

相似文献

1
Public-access defibrillation: where do we place the AEDs?公众可获取的除颤:自动体外除颤器应放置在何处?
Prehosp Emerg Care. 1999 Oct-Dec;3(4):303-5. doi: 10.1080/10903129908958958.
2
Location of cardiac arrest in a city center: strategic placement of automated external defibrillators in public locations.市中心心脏骤停的位置:公共场所自动体外除颤器的战略布局
Circulation. 2009 Aug 11;120(6):510-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.843755. Epub 2009 Jul 27.
3
Locations of cardiac arrest: affirmation for community Public Access Defibrillation (PAD) Program.心脏骤停的发生地点:对社区公众可获取除颤(PAD)项目的肯定
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2002 Oct-Dec;17(4):202-5. doi: 10.1017/s1049023x00000509.
4
The locations of nonresidential out-of-hospital cardiac arrests in the City of Pittsburgh over a three-year period: implications for automated external defibrillator placement.匹兹堡市三年期间院外非住宅心脏骤停的发生地点:对自动体外除颤器放置的启示
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2001 Jul-Sep;5(3):247-51. doi: 10.1080/10903120190939724.
5
Localization of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Goteborg 1994-2002 and implications for public access defibrillation.1994 - 2002年哥德堡院外心脏骤停的定位及其对公众可获取除颤的意义。
Resuscitation. 2005 Feb;64(2):171-5. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2004.08.006.
6
EMT defibrillation does not increase survival from sudden cardiac death in a two-tiered urban-suburban EMS system.在一个城乡两级急救医疗服务(EMS)系统中,急诊医疗服务(EMT)除颤并不能提高心源性猝死的生存率。
Ann Emerg Med. 1998 Feb;31(2):234-40. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(98)70313-0.
7
AED use in businesses, public facilities and homes by minimally trained first responders.经过最低限度培训的急救人员在企业、公共设施和家庭中使用自动体外除颤器。
Resuscitation. 2003 Nov;59(2):225-33. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(03)00214-4.
8
Mobile Versus Fixed Deployment of Automated External Defibrillators in Rural EMS.农村紧急医疗服务中自动体外除颤器的移动部署与固定部署
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2015 Apr;30(2):152-4. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X1500014X. Epub 2015 Feb 27.
9
An observational study describing the geographic-time distribution of cardiac arrests in Singapore: what is the utility of geographic information systems for planning public access defibrillation? (PADS Phase I).一项描述新加坡心脏骤停地理时间分布的观察性研究:地理信息系统在规划公众可获取除颤(PADS第一阶段)方面有何作用?
Resuscitation. 2008 Mar;76(3):388-96. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2007.09.006. Epub 2007 Oct 31.
10
Temporal trends in coverage of historical cardiac arrests using a volunteer-based network of automated external defibrillators accessible to laypersons and emergency dispatch centers.基于志愿者的自动体外除颤器网络,向非专业人员和紧急调度中心开放,用于覆盖历史心脏骤停的时间趋势。
Circulation. 2014 Nov 18;130(21):1859-67. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.008850. Epub 2014 Oct 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Automated external defibrillator location and socioeconomic deprivation in Great Britain.英国自动体外除颤器的位置与社会经济剥夺情况。
Heart. 2024 Jan 10;110(3):188-194. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2023-322985.
2
Effect of Optimized Versus Guidelines-Based Automated External Defibrillator Placement on Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Coverage: An In Silico Trial.优化与基于指南的自动体外除颤器放置对院外心脏骤停覆盖的影响:一项计算机模拟试验。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Sep;9(17):e016701. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.016701. Epub 2020 Aug 20.
3
Place-provider-matrix of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation and outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A nationwide observational cross-sectional analysis.
旁观者心肺复苏术的地点-提供者-矩阵与院外心脏骤停结局的关系:一项全国性观察性横断面分析。
PLoS One. 2020 May 15;15(5):e0232999. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232999. eCollection 2020.
4
Walking Route-Based Calculation is Recommended for Optimizing Deployment of Publicly Accessible Defibrillators in Urban Cities.推荐基于步行路径的计算方法来优化城市公共除颤器的部署。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Jan 21;9(2):e014398. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.014398. Epub 2020 Jan 11.
5
Increased cardiac arrest survival and bystander intervention in enclosed pedestrian walkway systems.在封闭的行人步道系统中,心脏骤停存活率和旁观者干预有所增加。
Resuscitation. 2017 Sep;118:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.06.013. Epub 2017 Jun 24.
6
Use of a geographic information system to identify differences in automated external defibrillator installation in urban areas with similar incidence of public out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a retrospective registry-based study.使用地理信息系统识别城市地区院外心脏骤停发生率相似情况下自动体外除颤器安装的差异:一项基于回顾性登记的研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 2;7(5):e014801. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014801.
7
Ranking Businesses and Municipal Locations by Spatiotemporal Cardiac Arrest Risk to Guide Public Defibrillator Placement.根据时空心脏骤停风险对企业和市政场所进行排名以指导公共除颤器的放置。
Circulation. 2017 Mar 21;135(12):1104-1119. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.025349.
8
Overcoming Spatial and Temporal Barriers to Public Access Defibrillators Via Optimization.通过优化克服公众获取自动体外除颤器的空间和时间障碍。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Aug 23;68(8):836-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.03.609.
9
Use of automated external defibrillators in US federal buildings: implementation of the Federal Occupational Health public access defibrillation program.美国联邦建筑中自动体外除颤器的使用:联邦职业健康公共接入除颤计划的实施。
J Occup Environ Med. 2014 Jan;56(1):86-91. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000042.
10
Modeling the impact of public access defibrillator range on public location cardiac arrest coverage.建模公共存取除颤器覆盖范围对公共位置心脏骤停覆盖范围的影响。
Resuscitation. 2013 Jul;84(7):904-9. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.11.019. Epub 2012 Nov 29.