Frank R L, Rausch M A, Menegazzi J J, Rickens M
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pennsylvania, USA.
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2001 Jul-Sep;5(3):247-51. doi: 10.1080/10903120190939724.
To determine the locations of nonresidential out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCAs) in the City of Pittsburgh and to determine whether there are "high-risk" locations that might benefit from placement of automated external defibrillators (AEDs).
This was a retrospective case review of paramedic calls for OHCA over a three-year period, in a mid-sized northeastern city. Cardiac arrests that were traumatic or for which the patients were dead on arrival (DOA) or had advanced directives for no resuscitation were excluded. Cardiac arrests that occurred in a public location (i.e., not a private residence) were categorized.
A total of 971 OHCAs occurred in the City of Pittsburgh from January 1, 1997, to December 31, 1999. Of these, 575 (59%) occurred in private residences, and 396 (41%) occurred in nonresidential locations. Fifteen locations had at least one cardiac arrest per year for three years, accounting for 166 (43%) of the total nonresidential OHCAs. Twelve locations had two arrests during the three-year period, accounting for 24 (6%) of the total nonresidential OHCAs. One hundred ninety-four locations had a single episode of cardiac arrest, accounting for 51% of the OHCAs. Nursing homes and dialysis centers accounted for 178 (94%) OHCAs in the 27 locations that had two or more cardiac arrests. A local sports/events complex (Three Rivers Stadium) was the only other single location to have more than two cardiac arrests in the three-year study period, with a total of three. However, events at this complex are routinely staffed by paramedics equipped with defibrillators.
The majority of nonresidential OHCAs occur as singular, isolated events. Other than nursing homes and dialysis centers, there were no identifiable high-risk locations for nonresidential OHCA within the City of Pittsburgh.
确定匹兹堡市院外非住宅心脏骤停(OHCA)的发生地点,并确定是否存在可能受益于自动体外除颤器(AED)放置的“高风险”地点。
这是对一个东北部中型城市三年期间护理人员接到的OHCA呼叫进行的回顾性病例审查。排除创伤性心脏骤停、患者到达时已死亡(DOA)或有不进行复苏的预先指示的情况。对发生在公共场所(即非私人住宅)的心脏骤停进行分类。
1997年1月1日至1999年12月31日,匹兹堡市共发生971起OHCA。其中,575起(59%)发生在私人住宅,396起(41%)发生在非住宅地点。有15个地点连续三年每年至少发生1起心脏骤停,占非住宅OHCA总数的166起(43%)。有12个地点在三年期间发生了2起心脏骤停,占非住宅OHCA总数的24起(6%)。194个地点发生了1次心脏骤停,占OHCA总数的51%。在有两起或更多心脏骤停的27个地点中,养老院和透析中心占178起(94%)OHCA。在为期三年的研究期间,当地的一个体育/活动综合体(三河体育场)是唯一另一个发生两起以上心脏骤停的单一地点,总共3起。然而,该综合体的活动通常配备有除颤器的护理人员。
大多数非住宅OHCA是单独发生的孤立事件。除了养老院和透析中心,匹兹堡市内没有可识别的非住宅OHCA高风险地点。