Zaylor C
Kansas University Medical Center, Kansas City 66160-7341, USA.
J Telemed Telecare. 1999;5 Suppl 1:S59-60. doi: 10.1258/1357633991932577.
A retrospective review of patient records comparing clinical outcomes of patients seen by interactive television (IATV) and those seen in person was carried out to determine whether IATV reduced the quality of psychiatric care. A Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) score was determined for each patient in both the study and control groups at the initial visit, and at subsequent visits. Forty-nine patients with either major depression or schizoaffective disorder were studied. No significant difference was found in the percentage change in GAF scores between the two groups, which suggests that clinical outcomes were not affected by the use of IATV. Patients seen by IATV had a greater attendance rate and follow-up visits took less than half the time compared with in-person visits, indicating that IATV was an acceptable and efficient method of providing psychiatric services.
对患者记录进行回顾性分析,比较通过交互式电视(IATV)就诊的患者与亲自就诊的患者的临床结局,以确定IATV是否降低了精神科护理质量。在初次就诊时以及随后的就诊中,为研究组和对照组的每位患者确定了功能总体评定量表(GAF)评分。对49例患有重度抑郁症或分裂情感性障碍的患者进行了研究。两组之间GAF评分的百分比变化没有显著差异,这表明临床结局不受IATV使用的影响。通过IATV就诊的患者出勤率更高,随访就诊时间不到亲自就诊时间的一半,这表明IATV是提供精神科服务的一种可接受且有效的方法。