Reiss M, Reiss G
Klinik und Poliklinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Dresden.
Praxis (Bern 1994). 1999 Sep 30;88(40):1610-6.
The present review shows the variability assessing sensoric asymmetries. There are preference and performance tests. Sensoric asymmetries are strongest and most manifest for eyedness (eye preference and performance), descending through earedness and other less known asymmetries. A vast range of testing techniques have been used to assess eyedness. Sighting dominance and self-report are two of the most popular techniques. Other preference measures include observation of how people use tools and questionnaires. Performance test assess speed and accuracy in tasks stressing sensoric dexterity. Although questionnaires are generally thought to be reliable and valid instruments, there is a disagreement as to the nature, the number and weighting of the items to be included.
本综述展示了评估感觉不对称性的变异性。有偏好测试和表现测试。感觉不对称性在利眼(用眼偏好和表现)方面最为强烈和明显,其次是利耳和其他不太为人所知的不对称性。已经使用了大量测试技术来评估利眼。视力优势和自我报告是最常用的两种技术。其他偏好测量方法包括观察人们使用工具的方式和问卷调查。表现测试评估在强调感觉敏捷性的任务中的速度和准确性。尽管问卷调查通常被认为是可靠且有效的工具,但对于所包含项目的性质、数量和权重存在分歧。