van Doorslaer E, Wagstaff A, van der Burg H, Christiansen T, Citoni G, Di Biase R, Gerdtham U G, Gerfin M, Gross L, Häkinnen U, John J, Johnson P, Klavus J, Lachaud C, Lauritsen J, Leu R, Nolan B, Pereira J, Propper C, Puffer F, Rochaix L, Schellhorn M, Sundberg G, Winkelhake O
Department of Health Policy, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
J Health Econ. 1999 Jun;18(3):291-313. doi: 10.1016/s0167-6296(98)00043-5.
The OECD countries finance their health care through a mixture of taxes, social insurance contributions, private insurance premiums and out-of-pocket payments. The various payment sources have very different implications for both vertical and horizontal equity and on redistributive effect which is a function of both. This paper presents results on the income redistribution consequences of the health care financing mixes adopted in twelve OECD countries by decomposing the overall income redistributive effect into a progressivity, horizontal inequity and reranking component. The general finding of this study is that the vertical effect is much more important than horizontal inequity and reranking in determining the overall redistributive effect but that their relative importance varies by source of payment. Public finance sources tend to have small positive redistributive effects and less differential treatment while private financing sources generally have (larger) negative redistributive effects which are to a substantial degree caused by differential treatment.
经合组织国家通过税收、社会保险缴款、私人保险费和自付费用等多种方式为医疗保健融资。不同的支付来源对纵向公平和横向公平以及再分配效应(这是两者共同作用的结果)都有非常不同的影响。本文通过将总体收入再分配效应分解为累进性、横向不公平性和重新排序成分,展示了经合组织12个国家采用的医疗保健融资组合对收入再分配的影响结果。本研究的总体发现是,在决定总体再分配效应方面,纵向效应比横向不公平性和重新排序更为重要,但它们的相对重要性因支付来源而异。公共财政来源往往具有较小的正向再分配效应和较少的差别待遇,而私人融资来源通常具有(较大的)负向再分配效应,这在很大程度上是由差别待遇造成的。