Achdut Leah
The Economic and Management Department, Ruppin Academic Center, Emek Hefer, Israel.
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2019 Dec 20;8(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s13584-019-0356-y.
The mixture of public vs. private financing of the healthcare system has important fiscal and economic welfare implications. The consequences of this mixture for access to health services and for equity have become highly debated policy issues. In the first decade of 2000s, Israel experienced a continuous upward trend in the proportion of private financing, reaching a peak of 37-38%, which has subsequently leveled off. The 38% level is significantly higher than the 26% average across the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries.
A recent paper by Tur-Sinai et al. in this journal shows that private spending by Israelis on health care is positively related to the income of individuals and to the socioeconomic status of their place of residence. This commentary draws attention to studies that integrate into one model both demand-side and supply-side determinants of private expenditures on healthcare. It also discusses inequity.
Overall, the financing of national health expenditures in Israel is slightly regressive, but the progressivity of public financing is almost enough to offset the regressive effect of out-of-pocket payments and payments for voluntary complementary insurance.
医疗保健系统中公共融资与私人融资的混合具有重要的财政和经济福利影响。这种混合对获得医疗服务和公平性的影响已成为备受争议的政策问题。在21世纪的第一个十年,以色列私人融资的比例持续上升,达到了37%-38%的峰值,随后趋于平稳。38%这一水平显著高于经济合作与发展组织(经合组织)国家26%的平均水平。
Tur-Sinai等人近期在本期刊发表的一篇论文表明,以色列人在医疗保健方面的私人支出与个人收入及其居住地的社会经济地位呈正相关。本评论提请关注将医疗保健私人支出的需求侧和供给侧决定因素整合到一个模型中的研究。它还讨论了不公平问题。
总体而言,以色列国家卫生支出的融资略显累退,但公共融资的累进性几乎足以抵消自付费用和自愿补充保险费用的累退效应。