幽门螺杆菌治疗失败后的七天“挽救”疗法:奥美拉唑、铋剂、四环素和甲硝唑与枸橼酸铋雷尼替丁、四环素和甲硝唑的对比
Seven-day 'rescue' therapy after Helicobacter pylori treatment failure: omeprazole, bismuth, tetracycline and metronidazole vs. ranitidine bismuth citrate, tetracycline and metronidazole.
作者信息
Gisbert J P, Gisbert J L, Marcos S, Grávalos R G, Carpio D, Pajares J M
机构信息
Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of 'La Princesa', Madrid, Spain.
出版信息
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1999 Oct;13(10):1311-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.1999.00615.x.
BACKGROUND
Eradication therapy with omeprazole (O), amoxycillin (A) and clarithromycin (C) is used extensively, although it often fails. A 'rescue' therapy with a quadruple combination of O, bismuth (B), tetracycline (T) and metronidazole (M) has been recommended.
AIM
: To assess ranitidine bismuth citrate (Rbc) instead of O and B for treatment failure.
METHODS
Sixty consecutive patients (13 duodenal ulcer, 47 non-ulcer dyspepsia) in whom a previous eradication trial with O, A and C had failed were randomized to receive one of two regimens for 7 days: O (20 mg b.d.), B (120 mg q. d.s.), T (500 mg q.d.s.) and M (250 mg q.d.s.) (group OBTM, n=30); or Rbc (400 mg b.d.), T (500 mg q.d.s.) and M (250 mg q.d.s.) (group RbcTM, n=30). Eradication was defined as a negative 13C-urea breath test 1 month after completing therapy.
RESULTS
Mean age +/- s.d. was 45 +/- 12 years, 47% were males. Distribution of studied variables (age, sex, smoking, duodenal ulcer/non-ulcer dyspepsia) was similar in both therapeutic groups. Per protocol eradication was achieved in 17 out of 29 patients (59%) in group OBTM and in 25 out of 29 patients (86%) in group RbcTM (P < 0.05). Intention-to-treat eradication was achieved, respectively, in 17 out of 30 (57%) and in 25 out of 30 (83%) (P < 0.05). In the multivariate analysis the variables which influenced on H. pylori eradication were the type of therapy (odds ratio, OR=3.9; 95%CI: 1.02-15; P < 0.05) and diagnosis (duodenal ulcer/non-ulcer dyspepsia) (OR=0.1; CI: 0.02-0.4). Adverse effects were infrequent and mild with both regimens.
CONCLUSION
Therapy with RbcTM is a promising option after H. pylori eradication failure with OCA, achieving a higher efficacy than quadruple therapy with OBTM.
背景
尽管奥美拉唑(O)、阿莫西林(A)和克拉霉素(C)的根除疗法经常失败,但仍被广泛使用。有人推荐使用由O、铋剂(B)、四环素(T)和甲硝唑(M)组成的四联“补救”疗法。
目的
评估用雷尼替丁枸橼酸铋(Rbc)替代O和B治疗失败的情况。
方法
连续纳入60例患者(13例十二指肠溃疡,47例非溃疡性消化不良),这些患者之前使用O、A和C进行根除治疗失败,将其随机分为两组,接受两种治疗方案之一,为期7天:O(20毫克,每日2次)、B(120毫克,每日4次)、T(500毫克,每日4次)和M(250毫克,每日4次)(OBTM组,n = 30);或Rbc(400毫克,每日2次)、T(500毫克,每日4次)和M(250毫克,每日4次)(RbcTM组,n = 30)。根除定义为治疗完成后1个月13C - 尿素呼气试验结果为阴性。
结果
平均年龄±标准差为45±12岁,47%为男性。两个治疗组中研究变量(年龄、性别、吸烟、十二指肠溃疡/非溃疡性消化不良)的分布相似。按照方案分析,OBTM组29例患者中有17例(59%)实现根除,RbcTM组29例患者中有25例(86%)实现根除(P < 0.05)。意向性分析分别在30例中的17例(57%)和30例中的25例(83%)实现根除(P < 0.05)。多因素分析中,影响幽门螺杆菌根除的变量是治疗类型(比值比,OR = 3.9;95%置信区间:1.02 - 15;P < 0.05)和诊断(十二指肠溃疡/非溃疡性消化不良)(OR = 0.1;置信区间:0.02 - 0.4)。两种治疗方案的不良反应均不常见且轻微。
结论
在使用OCA根除幽门螺杆菌失败后,RbcTM疗法是一个有前景的选择,其疗效高于OBTM四联疗法。