Hoptman M J, Yates K F, Patalinjug M B, Wack R C, Convit A
Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research in Orangeburg, New York, USA.
Psychiatr Serv. 1999 Nov;50(11):1461-6. doi: 10.1176/ps.50.11.1461.
Patient characteristics associated with the clinical prediction of assaultive behavior in a forensic psychiatric hospital were compared with characteristics associated with actual assaultive behavior.
Treating psychiatrists at a New York forensic psychiatric hospital were asked to predict which of a sample of 183 recently admitted male patients were likely to show assaultive behavior during a three-month period. The predictions were compared with incident reports of actual assaultive behavior. Several patient characteristics, including race, legal status, age, education, criminal history, psychiatric symptoms rated independently by raters other than the treating psychiatrists, and ward behavior, were examined for their association with predicted and actual assaultive behavior.
Clinicians' rate of correct prediction of assaultive behavior was 71 percent, with a diagnostic sensitivity of 54 percent and a diagnostic specificity of 79 percent. Characteristics associated with the prediction of assaultive behavior were race, transfer from a civil facility because of violence or dangerousness, age, education, arrests for violent offenses, childhood physical abuse, hostility, temper (or nurses' assessment of the patient's irritability), and inability to follow ward routine. Characteristics associated with actual assaultive behavior were transfer from a civil hospital, dual diagnosis of schizophrenia and substance abuse or dependence, childhood physical abuse, age, thought disorder, and temper.
Clinicians were significantly more accurate than chance in prospectively predicting which male forensic patients would show assaultive behavior. However, some of the factors associated with clinical prediction, such as race, ability to follow ward routine, and arrest history, were not associated with actual assaultive behavior. In addition, clinicians failed to use dual diagnosis of schizophrenia and substance use disorder as a predictor.
将法医精神病医院中与攻击行为临床预测相关的患者特征,与与实际攻击行为相关的特征进行比较。
纽约一家法医精神病医院的主治精神科医生被要求预测183名近期入院的男性患者样本中,哪些人可能在三个月内表现出攻击行为。将这些预测与实际攻击行为的事件报告进行比较。研究了几个患者特征,包括种族、法律地位、年龄、教育程度、犯罪史、由主治精神科医生以外的评估者独立评定的精神症状以及病房行为,以考察它们与预测的和实际的攻击行为之间的关联。
临床医生对攻击行为的正确预测率为71%,诊断敏感性为54%,诊断特异性为79%。与攻击行为预测相关的特征有:种族、因暴力或危险性从民事机构转来、年龄、教育程度、暴力犯罪被捕记录、童年期身体虐待、敌意、脾气(或护士对患者易怒性的评估)以及无法遵守病房常规。与实际攻击行为相关的特征有:从民事医院转来、精神分裂症与物质滥用或依赖的双重诊断、童年期身体虐待、年龄、思维障碍和脾气。
临床医生在对哪些男性法医患者会表现出攻击行为进行前瞻性预测时,其准确性显著高于随机猜测。然而,一些与临床预测相关的因素,如种族、遵守病房常规的能力和被捕史,与实际攻击行为并无关联。此外,临床医生未能将精神分裂症与物质使用障碍的双重诊断用作预测指标。