Sun Y, Eluf-Neto J, Bosch F X, Muñoz N, Walboomers J M, Meijer C J, Shah K V, Clayman B, Viscidi R P
Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21287, USA.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1999 Oct;8(10):935-40.
Serum samples from 194 cases and 217 controls participating in a case-control study of invasive cervical cancer in Brazil were examined for antibodies to human papillomavirus (HPV) 16 virus-like particles (VLPs) by ELISA. The prevalence of antibody in cases and controls was 47.4 versus 24.4% (P < 0.001). The prevalence was higher in women who had HPV-16 DNA in the genital tract (54.2%) than in those with other HPVs (36.8%) or no HPVs (44.8%), but the differences were not statistically significant. Among cases and controls, HPV-16 VLP antibodies were associated with a greater number of lifetime sexual partners (chi2 for trend, P < 0.001). Among controls, age was inversely associated with HPV-16 VLP seroreactivity (chi2 for trend, P = 0.019). The sera were previously tested for antibodies to HPV-16 E6 and E7 oncoproteins; there was no correlation between antibody titers to HPV-16 E6 or E7 and VLPs. The HPV-16 serological assays were compared as screening tests for invasive cervical cancer. The sensitivity and specificity estimates were 47.4 and 75.6% for HPV-16 VLP serology, 63.4 and 89.9% for either HPV-16 E6 or E7 serology, and 53.6 and 93.6% for high titers of either HPV-16 E6 or E7 or VLP antibodies. The utility of HPV-16 VLP ELISA as a screening test for invasive cervical cancer is limited by a high seroprevalence in women with probable prior exposure to HVP 16 but without disease.
对参与巴西浸润性宫颈癌病例对照研究的194例病例和217例对照的血清样本进行酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA),检测其针对人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)16型病毒样颗粒(VLP)的抗体。病例组和对照组的抗体阳性率分别为47.4%和24.4%(P<0.001)。生殖道有HPV-16 DNA的女性(54.2%)的阳性率高于有其他HPV的女性(36.8%)或无HPV的女性(44.8%),但差异无统计学意义。在病例组和对照组中,HPV-16 VLP抗体与更多的终身性伴侣数相关(趋势χ2检验,P<0.001)。在对照组中,年龄与HPV-16 VLP血清反应性呈负相关(趋势χ2检验,P = 0.019)。这些血清样本之前已检测过针对HPV-16 E6和E7癌蛋白的抗体;HPV-16 E6或E7抗体滴度与VLP之间无相关性。对HPV-16血清学检测作为浸润性宫颈癌筛查试验进行了比较。HPV-16 VLP血清学检测的敏感性和特异性估计分别为47.4%和75.6%,HPV-16 E6或E7血清学检测的敏感性和特异性估计分别为63.4%和89.9%,HPV-16 E6或E7或VLP抗体高滴度检测的敏感性和特异性估计分别为53.6%和93.6%。HPV-16 VLP ELISA作为浸润性宫颈癌筛查试验的效用受到有HPV 16型既往暴露史但无疾病的女性中高血清阳性率的限制。