Purdy J A
Radiation Oncology Center, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Oncology (Williston Park). 1999 Oct;13(10 Suppl 5):155-68.
Three-dimensional (3D) image-based treatment planning and new delivery technologies have spurred the implementation of external beam radiation therapy techniques, in which the high-dose region is conformed much more closely to the target volume than previously possible, thus reducing the volume of normal tissues receiving a high dose. This form of external beam irradiation is referred to as 3D conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT). 3DCRT is not just an add-on to the current radiation oncology process; it represents a radical change in practice, particularly for the radiation oncologist. Defining target volumes and organs at risk in 3D by drawing contours on CT images on a slice-by-slice basis, as opposed to drawing beam portals on a simulator radiograph, can be challenging, because radiation oncologists are generally not well trained in cross-sectional imaging. Currently, the 3DCRT approach will increase the time and effort required by physicians inexperienced with 3D treatment planning. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is a more advanced form of 3DCRT, but there is considerable developmental work remaining. The instrumentation and methods used for IMRT quality assurance procedures and testing are not well established. Computer optimization cost functions are too simplistic, and thus time-consuming. Subjective plan evaluation by the radiation oncologist is still the norm. In addition, many fundamental questions regarding IMRT remain unanswered. For example, the radiobiophysical consequences of altered time-dose-fraction are unknown. Also, the fact that there is much greater dose heterogeneity for both the target and normal critical structures with IMRT compared to traditional irradiation techniques challenges current radiation oncology planning principles. However, this new process of planning and treatment delivery shows significant potential for improving the therapeutic ratio. In addition, while inefficient today, these systems, when fully developed, will improve the efficiency with which external beam radiation therapy can be planned and delivered, thus lowering costs.
基于三维(3D)图像的治疗计划和新的放疗技术推动了外照射放疗技术的实施,在这种技术中,高剂量区域比以往更紧密地贴合靶区,从而减少了接受高剂量照射的正常组织体积。这种外照射形式被称为三维适形放疗(3DCRT)。3DCRT不仅仅是当前放射肿瘤学流程的附加内容;它代表了实践中的根本性变革,尤其是对放射肿瘤学家而言。通过在CT图像上逐片绘制轮廓来在三维空间中定义靶区和危及器官,与在模拟定位片上绘制射野不同,这可能具有挑战性,因为放射肿瘤学家通常在横断面成像方面训练不足。目前,3DCRT方法将增加缺乏三维治疗计划经验的医生所需的时间和精力。调强放射治疗(IMRT)是3DCRT的一种更先进形式,但仍有大量研发工作要做。用于IMRT质量保证程序和测试的仪器和方法尚未完全确立。计算机优化成本函数过于简单,因此耗时。放射肿瘤学家进行的主观计划评估仍是常态。此外,关于IMRT的许多基本问题仍未得到解答。例如,时间 - 剂量 - 分割改变的放射生物物理后果尚不清楚。而且,与传统照射技术相比,IMRT在靶区和正常关键结构方面存在更大的剂量不均匀性这一事实,对当前放射肿瘤学计划原则提出了挑战。然而,这种新的计划和治疗实施过程显示出显著的提高治疗比的潜力。此外,虽然目前效率不高,但这些系统在充分发展后,将提高外照射放疗计划和实施的效率,从而降低成本。