Billat V L, Mille-Hamard L, Petit B, Koralsztein J P
Faculté des Sciences de Sport, Université Lille 2, Centre de Médecine du Sport CCAS, Paris, France.
Int J Sports Med. 1999 Oct;20(7):429-37. doi: 10.1055/s-1999-8825.
The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of two different types of cyclic severe exercise (running and cycling) on the VO2 slow component. Moreover we examined the influence of cadence of exercise (freely chosen [FF] vs. low frequency [LF]) on the hypothesis that: 1) a stride frequency lower than optimal and 2) a pedalling frequency lower than FF one could induce a larger and/or lower VO2 slow component. Eight triathletes ran and cycled to exhaustion at a work-rate corresponding to the lactate threshold + 50% of the difference between the work-rate associated with VO2max and the lactate threshold (delta 50) at a freely chosen (FF) and low frequency (LF: - 10 % of FF). The time to exhaustion was not significantly different for both types of exercises and both cadences (13 min 39 s, 15 min 43 s, 13 min 32 s, 15 min 05 s for running at FF and LF and cycling at FF and LF, respectively). The amplitude of the VO2 slow component (i.e. difference between VO2 at the last and the 3rd min of the exercise) was significantly smaller during running compared with cycling, but there was no effect of cadence. Consequently, there was no relationship between the magnitude of the VO2 slow component and the time to fatigue for a severe exercise (r = 0.20, p = 0.27). However, time to fatigue was inversely correlated with the blood lactate concentration for both modes of exercise and both cadences (r = - 0.42, p = 0.01). In summary, these data demonstrate that: 1) in subjects well trained for both cycling and running, the amplitude of the VO2 slow component at fatigue was larger in cycling and that it was not significantly influenced by cadence; 2) the VO2 slow component was not correlated with the time to fatigue. If the nature of the linkage between the VO2 slow component and the fatigue process remains unclear, the type of contraction regimen depending on exercise biomechanic characteristics seems to be determinant in the VO2 slow component phenomenon for a same level of training.
本研究的目的是比较两种不同类型的周期性剧烈运动(跑步和骑自行车)对VO2慢成分的影响。此外,我们检验了运动节奏(自由选择[FF]与低频[LF])对以下假设的影响:1)步频低于最佳值;2)蹬踏频率低于FF可能会导致更大和/或更低的VO2慢成分。八名铁人三项运动员在自由选择(FF)和低频(LF:FF的 - 10%)的情况下,以对应于乳酸阈值 + VO2max与乳酸阈值之间差值的50%(δ50)的工作强度进行跑步和骑自行车至力竭。两种运动类型和两种节奏下的力竭时间无显著差异(跑步时FF和LF分别为13分39秒、15分43秒,骑自行车时FF和LF分别为13分32秒、15分05秒)。与骑自行车相比,跑步期间VO2慢成分的幅度(即运动最后一分钟与第三分钟时VO2的差值)显著更小,但节奏没有影响。因此,对于剧烈运动,VO2慢成分的大小与疲劳时间之间没有关系(r = 0.20,p = 0.27)。然而,两种运动模式和两种节奏下的疲劳时间均与血乳酸浓度呈负相关(r = - 0.42,p = 0.01)。总之,这些数据表明:1)在同时擅长骑自行车和跑步的受试者中,疲劳时VO2慢成分的幅度在骑自行车时更大,且不受节奏的显著影响;2)VO2慢成分与疲劳时间无关。如果VO2慢成分与疲劳过程之间的联系性质仍不清楚,那么对于相同训练水平,取决于运动生物力学特征的收缩方式似乎是VO2慢成分现象的决定因素。