Suppr超能文献

在不拔除导管的情况下快速诊断中心静脉导管相关血流感染

Rapid diagnosis of central-venous-catheter-related bloodstream infection without catheter removal.

作者信息

Kite P, Dobbins B M, Wilcox M H, McMahon M J

机构信息

Department of Microbiology, General Infirmary, University of Leeds, UK.

出版信息

Lancet. 1999 Oct 30;354(9189):1504-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)04070-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Current methods for the diagnosis of bloodstream infection related to central venous catheters (CVC) are slow and in many cases require catheter removal. Since most CVC that are removed on suspicion of causing infection prove not to be infected, removal of catheters unnecessarily exposes patients to the risks associated with reinsertion.

METHODS

The gram stain and acridine-orange leucocyte cytospin test (AOLC) is rapid (30 min), inexpensive, and requires only 100 microL catheter blood (treated with edetic acid) and the use of light and ultraviolet microscopy. We assessed the gram stain and AOLC test in suspected cases of catheter-related bloodstream infection, in comparison with two methods requiring catheter removal (tip roll and tip flush), and a third technique, done in situ (endoluminal brush) in conjunction with quantitative peripheral-blood cultures.

FINDINGS

128 cases of suspected catheter-related bloodstream infection were assessed in 124 adult surgical patients (median duration of CVC placement was 16 days). In 112 (88%) cases CVC blood was obtainable. Catheter-related bloodstream infection was diagnosed in 50 cases (culture of the same organism from the catheter, in significant numbers, and from peripheral-blood culture). The sensitivity of the gram stain and AOLC test was 96% and the specificity was 92%, with a positive predictive value of 91% and a negative predictive value of 97%. By comparison, the tip-roll, tip-flush, and endoluminal-brush methods had sensitivities of 90%, 95%, and 92%, and specificities of 55%, 76%, and 98%, respectively.

INTERPRETATION

The gram stain and AOLC test is a simple, and rapid method for the diagnosis of catheter-related bloodstream infection. This diagnostic method compares favourably with other diagnostic methods, particularly those that require the removal of the catheter, and can permit early targeted antimicrobial therapy.

摘要

背景

目前诊断与中心静脉导管(CVC)相关的血流感染的方法较为缓慢,且在许多情况下需要拔除导管。由于大多数因怀疑引起感染而被拔除的CVC经证实并未感染,不必要地拔除导管会使患者面临再次插管相关的风险。

方法

革兰氏染色和吖啶橙白细胞甩片试验(AOLC)快速(30分钟)、成本低,仅需100微升导管血(用乙二胺四乙酸处理),并使用光学显微镜和紫外线显微镜。我们在疑似导管相关血流感染的病例中评估了革兰氏染色和AOLC试验,与两种需要拔除导管的方法(尖端滚动和尖端冲洗)以及第三种原位进行的技术(腔内刷检)并结合外周血定量培养进行比较。

研究结果

对124例成年外科患者的128例疑似导管相关血流感染病例进行了评估(CVC放置的中位时间为16天)。在112例(88%)病例中可获取导管血。50例被诊断为导管相关血流感染(从导管中培养出大量相同微生物,且外周血培养也为该微生物)。革兰氏染色和AOLC试验的敏感性为96%,特异性为92%,阳性预测值为91%,阴性预测值为97%。相比之下,尖端滚动、尖端冲洗和腔内刷检方法的敏感性分别为90%、95%和92%,特异性分别为55%、76%和98%。

解读

革兰氏染色和AOLC试验是诊断导管相关血流感染的一种简单、快速的方法。这种诊断方法与其他诊断方法相比具有优势,尤其是那些需要拔除导管的方法,并且可以实现早期有针对性的抗菌治疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验