Suppr超能文献

老年糖尿病患者心肌梗死二级预防的β受体阻滞剂治疗。国家心血管合作项目的结果。

Beta-blocker therapy for secondary prevention of myocardial infarction in elderly diabetic patients. Results from the National Cooperative Cardiovascular Project.

作者信息

Chen J, Marciniak T A, Radford M J, Wang Y, Krumholz H M

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999 Nov 1;34(5):1388-94. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(99)00383-6.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We sought to determine the use and association with one-year mortality of beta-blocker therapy for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in elderly diabetic patients and to examine whether beta-blocker therapy was associated with increased rates of hospital readmission for diabetic complications traditionally associated with beta-blockers.

BACKGROUND

Although many randomized trials have demonstrated that beta-blockers are effective in reducing mortality after AMI, some experts are concerned about the use of beta-blockers in diabetic patients. Little is known about the effectiveness and complication rate of beta-blocker therapy after AMI for elderly diabetics in community practice settings.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the National Cooperative Cardiovascular Project, which contained data abstracted from hospital medical records of Medicare beneficiaries admitted with an AMI during 1994 and 1995.

RESULTS

Out of 45,308 patients without contraindications to beta-blocker therapy, 7.4% were insulin-treated diabetics and 18.5% were non-insulin-treated diabetics. Beta-blockers were prescribed at discharge for 45% of insulin-treated diabetics, 48.1% of non-insulin-treated diabetics and 51% of nondiabetics (p < 0.001). After adjusting for demographic and clinical factors, diabetics continued to be less likely to receive beta-blockers at discharge compared with nondiabetics (odds ratio [OR] for insulin-treated diabetics 0.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.82 to 0.96; OR for non-insulin-treated diabetics 0.93, 95% CI 0.88 to 0.98). After adjusting for potential confounders, beta-blockers were associated with lower one-year mortality for insulin-treated diabetics (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.87, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.07), non-insulin-treated diabetics (HR = 0.77, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.88) and nondiabetics (HR = 0.87, 95% CI 0.80 to 0.94). Beta-blocker therapy was not significantly associated with increased six-month readmission rates for diabetic complications among diabetics and nondiabetics.

CONCLUSIONS

Beta-blockers are associated with a lower one-year mortality rate for elderly diabetic patients to a similar extent as for nondiabetics, without increased risk of readmission for diabetic complications. Increasing the use of beta-blockers in elderly diabetic patients represents an opportunity to improve the care and outcomes of these patients after AMI.

摘要

目的

我们试图确定老年糖尿病患者急性心肌梗死(AMI)治疗中β受体阻滞剂疗法的使用情况及其与一年死亡率的关联,并研究β受体阻滞剂疗法是否与传统上与β受体阻滞剂相关的糖尿病并发症导致的住院再入院率增加有关。

背景

尽管许多随机试验已证明β受体阻滞剂可有效降低AMI后的死亡率,但一些专家对糖尿病患者使用β受体阻滞剂仍存在担忧。在社区实践环境中,关于老年糖尿病患者AMI后β受体阻滞剂疗法的有效性和并发症发生率知之甚少。

方法

我们使用国家心血管合作项目进行了一项回顾性队列研究,该项目包含从1994年和1995年因AMI入院的医疗保险受益人的医院病历中提取的数据。

结果

在45308例无β受体阻滞剂治疗禁忌证的患者中,7.4%为接受胰岛素治疗的糖尿病患者,18.5%为未接受胰岛素治疗的糖尿病患者。出院时,45%的接受胰岛素治疗的糖尿病患者、48.1%的未接受胰岛素治疗的糖尿病患者和51%的非糖尿病患者开具了β受体阻滞剂(p<0.001)。在调整人口统计学和临床因素后,与非糖尿病患者相比,糖尿病患者出院时接受β受体阻滞剂的可能性仍然较低(接受胰岛素治疗的糖尿病患者的优势比[OR]为0.88,95%置信区间[CI]为0.82至0.96;未接受胰岛素治疗的糖尿病患者的OR为0.93,95%CI为0.88至0.98)。在调整潜在混杂因素后,β受体阻滞剂与接受胰岛素治疗的糖尿病患者(风险比[HR]=0.87,95%CI为0.72至1.07)、未接受胰岛素治疗的糖尿病患者(HR=0.77,95%CI为0.67至0.88)和非糖尿病患者(HR=0.87,95%CI为0.80至0.94)的一年较低死亡率相关。β受体阻滞剂疗法与糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者因糖尿病并发症导致的六个月再入院率增加无显著关联。

结论

β受体阻滞剂与老年糖尿病患者一年较低死亡率相关,程度与非糖尿病患者相似,且不会增加糖尿病并发症再入院风险。增加老年糖尿病患者β受体阻滞剂的使用是改善这些患者AMI后护理和结局的一个机会。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验