• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

β受体阻滞剂在老年急性心肌梗死患者治疗中的全国性应用及疗效:国家心血管合作项目

National use and effectiveness of beta-blockers for the treatment of elderly patients after acute myocardial infarction: National Cooperative Cardiovascular Project.

作者信息

Krumholz H M, Radford M J, Wang Y, Chen J, Heiat A, Marciniak T A

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, and the Yale-New Haven Hospital Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, CT 06520-8025, USA.

出版信息

JAMA. 1998 Aug 19;280(7):623-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.7.623.

DOI:10.1001/jama.280.7.623
PMID:9718054
Abstract

CONTEXT

Despite the importance of beta-blockers for secondary prevention after acute myocardial infarction (AMI), several studies have suggested that they are substantially underutilized, particularly in older patients.

OBJECTIVES

To describe the contemporary national pattern of beta-blocker prescription at hospital discharge among patients aged 65 years or older with an AMI, to identify the most important predictors of the prescribed use of beta-blockers at discharge, and to determine the independent association between beta-blockers at discharge and mortality in clinical practice.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study using data created from medical charts and administrative files.

SETTING

Acute care nongovernmental hospitals in the United States.

PATIENTS

National cohort of 115015 eligible patients aged 65 years or older who survived hospitalization with a confirmed AMI in 1994 or 1995.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Blocker as a discharge medication and mortality in the year after discharge.

RESULTS

Among the 45308 patients without contraindications to beta-blockers, 22665 (50.0%) had a beta-blocker as a discharge medication. There was significant variation by state, ranging from 30.3% to 77.1 %. Of the 36795 patients who were not receiving beta-blocker therapy on admission, 16006 (43.5%) had therapy initiated on or before discharge. Demographic and clinical variables explained relatively little of the variation in the initiation of beta-blocker therapy. The prescribed use of calcium channel blockers at discharge had a strong negative association with the use of beta-blockers (odds ratio [OR] of beta-blocker use, 0.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.24-0.26). The New England region had significantly higher use of beta-blocker therapy than the rest of the country. Compared with cardiologists, internists had similar rates (OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.90-1.00) and general and family practice physicians had lower rates (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.73-0.83). After adjusting for potential confounders, beta-blockers were associated with a 14% lower risk of mortality at 1 year after discharge. The association with lower mortality was present in subgroups stratified by age, sex, and left ventricular ejection fraction.

CONCLUSIONS

Many ideal patients for beta-blocker therapy are not prescribed these drugs at discharge following AMI. The clinical and demographic characteristics of the patients do not explain much of the variation in the treatment pattern. Geographic factors and physician specialty are independently associated with the decision to use beta-blockers. Elderly patients who are prescribed beta-blockers at discharge have a better survival rate, consistent with the findings of randomized controlled trials of younger and lower-risk populations.

摘要

背景

尽管β受体阻滞剂对急性心肌梗死(AMI)后的二级预防很重要,但多项研究表明,它们的使用严重不足,尤其是在老年患者中。

目的

描述65岁及以上AMI患者出院时β受体阻滞剂的当代全国处方模式,确定出院时β受体阻滞剂处方使用的最重要预测因素,并确定临床实践中出院时使用β受体阻滞剂与死亡率之间的独立关联。

设计

使用从病历和管理文件中创建的数据进行回顾性队列研究。

地点

美国的非政府急症医院。

患者

1994年或1995年确诊AMI后住院存活的115015名65岁及以上符合条件的全国队列患者。

主要观察指标

出院时使用阻滞剂作为药物以及出院后一年内的死亡率。

结果

在45308名无β受体阻滞剂禁忌症的患者中,22665名(50.0%)出院时使用了β受体阻滞剂。各州之间存在显著差异,范围从30.3%到77.1%。在入院时未接受β受体阻滞剂治疗的36795名患者中,16006名(43.5%)在出院时或出院前开始接受治疗。人口统计学和临床变量对β受体阻滞剂治疗开始的差异解释相对较少。出院时使用钙通道阻滞剂与β受体阻滞剂的使用呈强烈负相关(β受体阻滞剂使用的比值比[OR]为0.25;95%置信区间[CI]为0.24 - 0.26)。新英格兰地区β受体阻滞剂治疗的使用率明显高于美国其他地区。与心脏病专家相比,内科医生的使用率相似(OR为0.94;95%CI为0.90 - 1.00),普通内科和家庭医生的使用率较低(OR为0.78;95%CI为0.73 - 0.83)。在调整潜在混杂因素后,β受体阻滞剂与出院后1年死亡率降低14%相关。在按年龄、性别和左心室射血分数分层的亚组中,也存在与较低死亡率的关联。

结论

许多适合使用β受体阻滞剂治疗的理想患者在AMI出院时未开具这些药物。患者的临床和人口统计学特征并不能很好地解释治疗模式的差异。地理因素和医生专业与使用β受体阻滞剂的决定独立相关。出院时开具β受体阻滞剂的老年患者生存率更高,这与年轻和低风险人群的随机对照试验结果一致。

相似文献

1
National use and effectiveness of beta-blockers for the treatment of elderly patients after acute myocardial infarction: National Cooperative Cardiovascular Project.β受体阻滞剂在老年急性心肌梗死患者治疗中的全国性应用及疗效:国家心血管合作项目
JAMA. 1998 Aug 19;280(7):623-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.7.623.
2
Beta-Blocker Use in U.S. Nursing Home Residents After Myocardial Infarction: A National Study.美国心肌梗死后疗养院居民使用β受体阻滞剂的全国性研究。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017 Apr;65(4):754-762. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14671. Epub 2016 Nov 15.
3
Beta-blocker therapy for secondary prevention of myocardial infarction in elderly diabetic patients. Results from the National Cooperative Cardiovascular Project.老年糖尿病患者心肌梗死二级预防的β受体阻滞剂治疗。国家心血管合作项目的结果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999 Nov 1;34(5):1388-94. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(99)00383-6.
4
Adverse outcomes of underuse of beta-blockers in elderly survivors of acute myocardial infarction.老年急性心肌梗死幸存者β受体阻滞剂使用不足的不良后果。
JAMA. 1997 Jan 8;277(2):115-21.
5
Association between functional status and use and effectiveness of beta-blocker prophylaxis in elderly survivors of acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死老年幸存者的功能状态与β受体阻滞剂预防用药及其疗效之间的关联
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004 Apr;52(4):495-501. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52153.x.
6
Predictors, Trends, and Outcomes (Among Older Patients ≥65 Years of Age) Associated With Beta-Blocker Use in Patients With Stable Angina Undergoing Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From the NCDR Registry.与接受择期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的稳定型心绞痛患者中使用β受体阻滞剂相关的预测因素、趋势和结局(年龄≥65 岁的老年患者):来自 NCDR 注册研究的结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Aug 22;9(16):1639-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.05.048.
7
Are beta-blockers effective in elderly patients who undergo coronary revascularization after acute myocardial infarction?β受体阻滞剂对急性心肌梗死后接受冠状动脉血运重建的老年患者是否有效?
Arch Intern Med. 2000 Apr 10;160(7):947-52. doi: 10.1001/archinte.160.7.947.
8
Aspirin for secondary prevention after acute myocardial infarction in the elderly: prescribed use and outcomes.阿司匹林用于老年急性心肌梗死后的二级预防:处方使用情况及结果
Ann Intern Med. 1996 Feb 1;124(3):292-8. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-124-3-199602010-00002.
9
Association of β-Blockers With Functional Outcomes, Death, and Rehospitalization in Older Nursing Home Residents After Acute Myocardial Infarction.β受体阻滞剂与老年疗养院居民急性心肌梗死后功能结局、死亡及再住院的关联
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Feb 1;177(2):254-262. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.7701.
10
β blockers and mortality after myocardial infarction in patients without heart failure: multicentre prospective cohort study.β受体阻滞剂与无心力衰竭心肌梗死患者的死亡率:多中心前瞻性队列研究
BMJ. 2016 Sep 20;354:i4801. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i4801.

引用本文的文献

1
Regional variations in primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction patients: A trajectory analysis using the national claims database in Japan.日本国家索赔数据库中的轨迹分析:急性心肌梗死患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的地域差异。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 22;19(10):e0312248. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312248. eCollection 2024.
2
Chronic Coronary Disease in Older Adults.老年人慢性冠状动脉疾病。
Med Clin North Am. 2024 May;108(3):581-594. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2023.12.004. Epub 2024 Jan 4.
3
Impact of Diabetes Mellitus on Benefit of β-Blocker Therapy After Myocardial Infarction.
糖尿病对心肌梗死后β受体阻滞剂治疗获益的影响。
Am J Cardiol. 2023 Jul 1;198:124-132. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.04.022. Epub 2023 May 12.
4
Disparities in adoption of new diabetic therapies with cardiovascular benefits.新的糖尿病治疗方法在心血管获益方面的采用存在差异。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2023 Feb;196:110233. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2022.110233. Epub 2022 Dec 26.
5
Development and validation of a risk prediction model for in-hospital major cardiovascular events in patients hospitalised for acute myocardial infarction.开发和验证急性心肌梗死后住院患者院内主要心血管事件的风险预测模型。
BMJ Open. 2021 May 27;11(5):e042506. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042506.
6
Assessing Geographical Variations in Hospital Processes of Care Using Multilevel Item Response Models.使用多级项目反应模型评估医院护理过程中的地理差异。
Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol. 2010 Dec;10(3-4):111-133. doi: 10.1007/s10742-010-0065-z. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
7
Adherence to beta-blockers and long-term risk of heart failure and mortality after a myocardial infarction.心肌梗死后β受体阻滞剂的依从性与心力衰竭和死亡的长期风险
ESC Heart Fail. 2021 Feb;8(1):344-355. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13079. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
8
Geographic Variation in Process and Outcomes of Care for Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction in China From 2001 to 2015.中国 2001 年至 2015 年急性心肌梗死患者的治疗过程和结局的地域差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Oct 1;3(10):e2021182. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.21182.
9
Regional Variation in the Management and Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction With Cardiogenic Shock in the United States.美国伴心原性休克的急性心肌梗死的治疗和结局的地域差异。
Circ Heart Fail. 2020 Feb;13(2):e006661. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.119.006661. Epub 2020 Feb 14.
10
Self-perceived evidence-based practice competencies: a survey of faculty and students at a chiropractic institution.自我认知的循证实践能力:对一所脊椎按摩疗法机构的教师和学生的调查。
J Chiropr Educ. 2021 Mar 1;35(1):22-27. doi: 10.7899/JCE-18-24.