Zullo Andrew R, Lee Yoojin, Daiello Lori A, Mor Vincent, John Boscardin W, Dore David D, Miao Yinghui, Fung Kathy Z, Komaiko Kiya D R, Steinman Michael A
Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
Center of Innovation, Providence Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, Rhode Island.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017 Apr;65(4):754-762. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14671. Epub 2016 Nov 15.
To evaluate how often beta-blockers were started after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in nursing home (NH) residents who previously did not use these drugs and to evaluate which factors were associated with post-AMI use of beta-blockers.
Retrospective cohort using linked national Minimum Data Set assessments; Online Survey, Certification and Reporting records; and Medicare claims.
U.S. NHs.
National cohort of 15,720 residents aged 65 and older who were hospitalized for AMI between May 2007 and March 2010, had not taken beta-blockers for at least 4 months before their AMI, and survived 14 days or longer after NH readmission.
The outcome was beta-blocker initiation within 30 days of NH readmission.
Fifty-seven percent (n = 8,953) of residents initiated a beta-blocker after AMI. After covariate adjustment, use of beta-blockers was less in older residents (ranging from odds ratio (OR) = 0.89, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.79-1.00 for aged 75-84 to OR = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.54-0.79 for ≥95 vs 65-74) and less in residents with higher levels of functional impairment (dependent or totally dependent vs independent to limited assistance: OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.75-0.94) and medication use (≥15 vs ≤10 medications: OR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.80-0.99). A wide variety of resident and NH characteristics were not associated with beta-blocker use, including sex, cognitive function, comorbidity burden, and NH ownership.
Almost half of older NH residents in the United States do not initiate a beta-blocker after AMI. The absence of observed factors that strongly predict beta-blocker use may indicate a lack of consensus on how to manage older NH residents, suggesting the need to develop and disseminate thoughtful practice standards.
评估既往未使用β受体阻滞剂的疗养院(NH)居民在急性心肌梗死(AMI)后开始使用β受体阻滞剂的频率,并评估哪些因素与AMI后使用β受体阻滞剂相关。
采用全国性关联最小数据集评估、在线调查、认证和报告记录以及医疗保险索赔数据进行回顾性队列研究。
美国疗养院。
2007年5月至2010年3月期间因AMI住院、AMI前至少4个月未服用β受体阻滞剂且疗养院再次入院后存活14天或更长时间的15720名65岁及以上居民的全国性队列。
结局为疗养院再次入院后30天内开始使用β受体阻滞剂。
57%(n = 8953)的居民在AMI后开始使用β受体阻滞剂。经过协变量调整后,老年居民使用β受体阻滞剂的比例较低(75 - 84岁的比值比(OR)= 0.89,95%置信区间(CI)= 0.79 - 1.00;≥95岁与65 - 74岁相比,OR = 0.65,95% CI = 0.54 - 0.79),功能损害程度较高的居民(依赖或完全依赖与独立至有限协助相比:OR = 0.84,95% CI = 0.75 - 0.94)以及用药数量较多的居民(≥15种与≤10种药物相比:OR = 0.89,95% CI = 0.80 - 0.99)使用β受体阻滞剂的比例也较低。多种居民和疗养院特征与β受体阻滞剂的使用无关,包括性别、认知功能、合并症负担和疗养院所有权。
美国近一半的老年疗养院居民在AMI后未开始使用β受体阻滞剂。未观察到能强烈预测β受体阻滞剂使用的因素可能表明在如何管理老年疗养院居民方面缺乏共识,这表明需要制定和传播周全的实践标准。