McCloskey M S, Kumar V K, Pekala R J
Department of Psychology, West Chester University of Pennsylvania, PA 19383, USA.
Am J Clin Hypn. 1999 Jan;41(3):231-52. doi: 10.1080/00029157.1999.10404215.
This study (n = 465) examined if (a) hypnotic susceptibility (assessed by the Harvard Group Scale, Form A) was related to state and trait depression, and physical and social anhedonia, and (b) phenomenological experiences (assessed by the Phenomenology of Consciousness Inventory [PCI]) varied with depression, anhedonia,and hypnotizability during hypnosis, compared with a sitting quietly condition. Only physical anhedonia showed a weak, but significant, negative correlation with hypnotizability. Hypnosis, compared with the sitting quietly condition, facilitated lowering of feelings of sadness especially for the chronically depressed. Other results pertaining to phenomenological experiences suggest that in future studies, instead of only correlating individual difference variables with hypnotizability, it may be more fruitful to explore their relationships with what happens during hypnosis in terms of reported phenomenological experiences.
本研究(n = 465)考察了:(a)催眠易感性(通过哈佛群体量表A式评估)是否与状态和特质抑郁以及身体和社交快感缺失有关;(b)与安静坐着的状态相比,催眠过程中现象学体验(通过意识现象学量表[PCI]评估)是否随抑郁、快感缺失和催眠易感性而变化。只有身体快感缺失与催眠易感性呈微弱但显著的负相关。与安静坐着的状态相比,催眠有助于减轻悲伤情绪,尤其是对慢性抑郁症患者。其他与现象学体验相关的结果表明,在未来的研究中,与其仅仅将个体差异变量与催眠易感性进行关联,不如根据所报告的现象学体验来探索它们与催眠过程中发生的事情之间的关系,这样可能更有成效。