Bowen A M, Dammeyer M M
Department of Psychology, University of Wyoming, Laramie 82071-3415, USA.
J Pediatr Nurs. 1999 Oct;14(5):296-303. doi: 10.1016/S0882-5963(99)80029-3.
The purpose of this study was to compare two brief, inexpensive distraction techniques for children receiving immunizations during a county-sponsored immunization clinic. Preschool children (n = 80) were assigned to a party blower intervention, a pinwheel intervention, or a control group. Nurses were instructed to use "standard instructions" for the control group, and to simply provide the distracter and encourage use, but not to spend time trying to train the child or force them to use it, for the other groups. Results of planned comparisons indicated significant party blower results in the children's ratings of reduced distress (P < .01) and the parents' ratings of having to hold their child less strongly (P = .04), and showed it to be more distracting than the pinwheel (P < .02). The overall pattern of results on all rating scales supports the efficacy of using a party blower for reducing children's immunization distress, with minimal staff training and no procedural delay.
本研究的目的是比较两种简便、廉价的分心技术,用于在县主办的免疫诊所接受免疫接种的儿童。学龄前儿童(n = 80)被分配到派对吹管干预组、纸风车干预组或对照组。护士被指示对对照组使用“标准指导语”,而对其他组则只需提供分心物并鼓励使用,但不要花时间试图训练儿童或强迫他们使用。计划比较的结果表明,派对吹管在降低儿童痛苦评分方面有显著效果(P < .01),在家长关于抱孩子力度减轻的评分方面也有显著效果(P = .04),并且显示出比纸风车更具分心作用(P < .02)。所有评分量表上的总体结果模式支持使用派对吹管减轻儿童免疫接种痛苦的有效性,只需最少的工作人员培训且无程序延迟。