Suppr超能文献

[使用可摘矫治器和固定矫治器的正畸治疗——立场声明]

[Orthodontic therapy using removable and fixed appliances--a statement of position].

作者信息

Stöckli P W

出版信息

SSO Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnheilkd. 1975 Mar;85(3):309-13, 328-37.

PMID:1055464
Abstract

Even in the planning process of orthodontic therapy the primary question should not be directed to the type of appliance to be used. An outline of basic considerations is presented, the evaluation of which leads in a logical way to the choice of appliance and the appropriate procedure. No controversy can evolve between "removable" and "fixed" provided the orthodontist is capable in both sectors. In regard to fixed appliance, it can be stated that the technical limitations of the edgewise mechanism--designed by Angle almost 50 years ago, in the meantime modified and again supplemented by a variety of extraoral force systems--still exceed by far the biologically imposed limitations. The technical versatility of this mechanism could fulfill until now almost all of the changing demands of orthodontic therapy which derived from the continuously enlarging spectrum of knowledge.

摘要

即使在正畸治疗的计划过程中,首要问题也不应指向要使用的矫治器类型。本文给出了一些基本考虑要点,对其评估会以合乎逻辑的方式导向矫治器的选择及恰当的治疗程序。只要正畸医生在这两个领域都有能力,那么在“可摘矫治器”和“固定矫治器”之间就不会产生争议。关于固定矫治器,可以说,由安格尔(Angle)于近50年前设计的方丝弓矫治技术,虽历经改进并不断有各种口外力系统补充,但至今其技术局限性仍远远超过生物学限制。到目前为止,这种矫治技术的多功能性几乎能够满足正畸治疗中不断变化的需求,而这些需求源于知识范围的持续扩大。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验