Josefsson E, Halling A
Centre for Orthodontics/Pediatric dentistry/Periodontology, Motala, Sweden.
Swed Dent J. 2000;24(4):165-72.
In 1993 and 1994, economic restrictions were introduced in the County of Ostergötland. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence on delivery and quality of orthodontic care, i.e. any subsequent change in number of patients receiving orthodontic treatment both by General Public Dental Service (GPDS) and by specialist clinic, the choice of appliance, and treatment outcomes, and also any changes in the total number of appliance treatments by general practitioners. Records were examined for 236 and 213 patients registered in 1994 and 1997, respectively, at an orthodontic clinic in the western district of Ostergötland. The total number of appliance treatments by general practitioners was estimated. The number of patients receiving initial treatment by a general practitioner and subsequently by an orthodontist, was relatively unchanged during the period. Quad helix predominated in both 1994 and 1997. The best treatment outcomes were achieved by quad helix and maxillary removable appliances, and the poorest by activators and headgear. In conclusion the total number of appliance treatments by general practitioners decreased as well as treatments requiring patient compliance over an extended period, findings which might be a consequence of the coincident economic restriction.
1993年和1994年,东约特兰郡实施了经济限制措施。本研究的目的是调查其对正畸治疗的提供和质量的影响,即大众牙科服务(GPDS)和专科诊所接受正畸治疗的患者数量的任何后续变化、矫治器的选择和治疗结果,以及全科医生进行的矫治器治疗总数的任何变化。分别检查了1994年和1997年在东约特兰郡西区一家正畸诊所登记的236名和213名患者的记录。估算了全科医生进行的矫治器治疗总数。在此期间,由全科医生进行初始治疗并随后由正畸医生治疗的患者数量相对没有变化。1994年和1997年,四螺旋矫治器均占主导地位。四螺旋矫治器和上颌可摘矫治器取得了最佳治疗效果,而肌激动器和头帽取得的效果最差。总之,全科医生进行的矫治器治疗总数减少,需要患者长期配合的治疗也减少,这些结果可能是同时实施的经济限制措施的结果。