Akyol D, Mungan T, Unsal A, Yüksel K
Dr Zekai Tahir Burak Women's Hospital, Faculty of Economic and Administrated Science, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999 Aug;39(3):291-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.1999.tb03399.x.
We performed a prospective randomized study to compare maternal and fetal outcomes in pregnancies with prelabour rupture of the membranes (PROM) at term with early induction of labour or expectant management, 126 women with singleton pregnancy, cephalic presentation and gestational duration > or = 37 weeks, were randomized either to immediate induction of labour with oxytocin (Group 1) (n=52), or conservative management (Group 2) (n=74). Women who constituted Group 2 were divided into 2 groups. The first group (Group 2A) (n=25) included women in whom spontaneous labour did not begin after a waiting period of 24 hours, in which case labour was induced with oxytocin i.e. expectant management. The second group consisted of women (Group 2B) (n=49) in whom labour began spontaneously within 24 hours. The base Caesarean section rate was significantly higher in Group 2 (28.4%) (p<0.05). The rates of Caesarean section in the Groups 1-2A-2B were 19.2%, 60%, and 12.2%, respectively for nulliparous and parous women together. The rate of fetal distress was significantly higher in Group 2 (p<0.05). For determining maternal outcomes, the other parameters such as clinical chorioamnionitis, fever before or during labour, receiving antibiotics before or during labour, postpartum fever, analgesia, anaesthesia did not differ in Groups 1 and 2. Women in Group 1 went into active labour sooner, had fewer digital vaginal examinations, had a shorter interval between membrane rupture and delivery, and spent less time in the hospital before delivery than those in Group 2 (p<0.05). Babies in Group 2 were more likely to receive antibiotics, and more likely to stay in an intensive care nursery for more than 24 hours, and more likely to receive ventilation after initial resuscitation than those babies in Group 1. For developing apnoea and hypotonia, there was no significant difference between Groups 1 and 2. However, for babies in Group 2A there was a significant difference. We conclude that immediate induction of labour with oxytocin does not increase the risk of Caesarean section, compared with a practice of expectant management. Women at term with prelabour rupture of the membranes should therefore be reassured that immediate induction with oxytocin currently appears to be the best policy with respect to maternal and neonatal morbidity.
我们进行了一项前瞻性随机研究,以比较足月胎膜早破(PROM)孕妇早期引产与期待治疗的母婴结局。126名单胎妊娠、头先露且孕周≥37周的妇女被随机分为两组,一组用缩宫素立即引产(第1组)(n = 52),另一组进行保守治疗(第2组)(n = 74)。第2组的妇女又分为两组。第一组(第2A组)(n = 25)包括等待24小时后仍未自然发动分娩的妇女,这种情况下用缩宫素引产,即期待治疗。第二组由在24小时内自然发动分娩的妇女组成(第2B组)(n = 49)。第2组的剖宫产率显著更高(28.4%)(p<0.05)。第1组、第2A组和第2B组初产妇和经产妇总的剖宫产率分别为19.2%、60%和12.2%。第2组胎儿窘迫率显著更高(p<0.05)。在确定母亲结局方面,第1组和第2组在临床绒毛膜羊膜炎、分娩前或分娩期间发热、分娩前或分娩期间接受抗生素治疗、产后发热、镇痛、麻醉等其他参数方面没有差异。第1组的妇女比第2组的妇女更早进入活跃期,阴道指诊次数更少,胎膜破裂至分娩的间隔更短,分娩前住院时间更短(p<0.05)。第2组的婴儿比第1组的婴儿更有可能接受抗生素治疗,更有可能在重症监护病房停留超过24小时,在初始复苏后更有可能接受通气治疗。在发生呼吸暂停和肌张力减退方面,第1组和第2组之间没有显著差异。然而,第2A组的婴儿存在显著差异。我们得出结论,与期待治疗相比,用缩宫素立即引产不会增加剖宫产风险。因此,足月胎膜早破的妇女应放心,就母婴发病率而言,目前用缩宫素立即引产似乎是最佳策略。