Hanna E, Schultz S, Doctor D, Vural E, Stern S, Suen J
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock 72205-7199, USA.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999 Nov;125(11):1247-51. doi: 10.1001/archotol.125.11.1247.
The current health care climate demands the provision of quality patient care in a cost-effective manner. Clinical pathways define the essential components of care that are provided to patients with a specific diagnosis to achieve a desired outcome within a predetermined period. Development and implementation of clinical pathways streamline the provision of quality care in the most cost-effective manner.
To develop a clinical pathway for patients undergoing total laryngectomy and to evaluate its impact on the cost and quality of care provided to these patients.
A tertiary care academic medical center.
A total of 45 patients were included in the study. The clinical pathway was implemented for 15 patients, while the other 30 patients were treated without the implementation of the pathway guidelines.
Length of hospital stay, readmission rate, and hospital variable costs.
The clinical pathway affected all cost outcome measures. Length of stay decreased by 2.4 days (29%; P=.001), and the average hospital variable cost decreased from $3992 to $3419 per case. This represents a 14.4% reduction in cost associated with pathway implementation (P=.02). The standardization of care eliminated unnecessary variation and repetition in resource usage, resulting in overall cost reduction. Pathway implementation resulted in a lower readmission rate (7% [1/15]) than that of patients treated prior to protocol implementation (23% [7/30]).
Implementing a carefully developed clinical pathway may reduce cost without compromising the quality of care for patients undergoing total laryngectomy.
当前的医疗环境要求以具有成本效益的方式提供高质量的患者护理。临床路径定义了为特定诊断的患者提供护理的基本组成部分,以便在预定时间内实现预期结果。临床路径的开发和实施以最具成本效益的方式简化了高质量护理的提供。
为全喉切除术患者制定临床路径,并评估其对这些患者所提供护理的成本和质量的影响。
一家三级医疗学术医学中心。
共有45名患者纳入研究。对15名患者实施了临床路径,而其他30名患者在未实施路径指南的情况下接受治疗。
住院时间、再入院率和医院可变成本。
临床路径影响了所有成本结果指标。住院时间减少了2.4天(29%;P = 0.001),每例患者的平均医院可变成本从3992美元降至3419美元。这代表与路径实施相关的成本降低了14.4%(P = 0.02)。护理的标准化消除了资源使用中的不必要差异和重复,从而降低了总体成本。路径实施导致再入院率(7% [1/15])低于方案实施前治疗的患者(23% [7/30])。
实施精心制定的临床路径可能会降低成本,而不会影响全喉切除术患者的护理质量。