• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Algorithm based patient care protocol to optimize patient care and inpatient stay in head and neck free flap patients.基于算法的患者护理方案,以优化头颈部游离皮瓣患者的护理及住院情况。
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Nov 2;44:45. doi: 10.1186/s40463-015-0090-6.
2
Improving Head and Neck Microvascular Reconstructive Care with a Novel Perioperative Checklist.采用新型围手术期检查表改善头颈部微血管重建护理。
Laryngoscope. 2021 Jul;131(7):E2251-E2256. doi: 10.1002/lary.29401. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
3
Vascularized tissue transfer in head and neck surgery: Is intensive care unit-based management necessary?头颈外科中的带血管组织移植:是否有必要在重症监护病房进行管理?
Laryngoscope. 2016 Jan;126(1):73-9. doi: 10.1002/lary.25608. Epub 2015 Sep 7.
4
Supraclavicular Artery Island Flap: Critical Appraisal and Comparison to Alternate Reconstruction.锁骨上动脉岛状瓣:关键评价与其他重建方法比较。
Laryngoscope. 2022 Feb;132 Suppl 3:1-14. doi: 10.1002/lary.28706. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
5
Head and neck free flap reconstruction: What is the appropriate post-operative level of care?头颈部游离皮瓣重建:术后应给予何种级别的护理?
Oral Oncol. 2017 Dec;75:61-66. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2017.10.022. Epub 2017 Nov 5.
6
Value of Intensive Care Unit-Based Postoperative Management for Microvascular Free Flap Reconstruction in Head and Neck Surgery.头颈部手术中基于重症监护病房的术后管理对微血管游离皮瓣重建的价值。
Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med. 2021 Jan-Feb;23(1):49-53. doi: 10.1089/fpsam.2020.0055. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
7
Immediate Use of Uncuffed Tracheostomy after Free Flap Reconstruction of the Head and Neck.头颈部游离皮瓣重建术后立即行无套囊气管切开术。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 Aug;159(2):242-248. doi: 10.1177/0194599818766009. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
8
Reduction of pulmonary complications and hospital length of stay with a clinical care pathway after head and neck reconstruction.头颈部重建术后临床护理路径可减少肺部并发症和住院时间。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Jun;133(6):1477-1484. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000217.
9
Outcomes in head and neck reconstruction by surgical site and donor site.头颈部重建的手术部位和供区结果。
Laryngoscope. 2013 Jul;123(7):1612-7. doi: 10.1002/lary.23775. Epub 2013 May 17.
10
Improving quality outcomes in head and neck free flap surgery with the use of a physician inpatient coordinator.通过使用内科住院医师协调员提高头颈部游离皮瓣手术的质量结果。
Laryngoscope. 2018 Feb;128(2):336-342. doi: 10.1002/lary.26658. Epub 2017 May 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Opioid-Free Anaesthesia Reduces Complications in Head and Neck Microvascular Free-Flap Reconstruction.非阿片类麻醉可减少头颈部游离微血管皮瓣重建手术中的并发症。
J Clin Med. 2023 Oct 10;12(20):6445. doi: 10.3390/jcm12206445.
2
Novel Technique with Double Free Flap Design for Advanced Mandibular Osteoradionecrosis: A Case Series.用于晚期下颌骨放射性骨坏死的双游离皮瓣设计新技术:病例系列
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020 Sep 24;8(9):e3149. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003149. eCollection 2020 Sep.
3
Transoral robotic surgery with radial forearm free flap reconstruction: case control analysis.经口机器人手术联合桡侧前臂游离皮瓣重建:病例对照分析
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Mar 14;46(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s40463-017-0196-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness analysis of a postoperative clinical care pathway in head and neck surgery with microvascular reconstruction.头颈部显微血管重建术后临床护理路径的成本效益分析
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013 Dec 19;42(1):59. doi: 10.1186/1916-0216-42-59.
2
Postoperative medical complications--not microsurgical complications--negatively influence the morbidity, mortality, and true costs after microsurgical reconstruction for head and neck cancer.术后医疗并发症——而非显微手术并发症——对头颈部癌显微外科重建术后的发病率、死亡率及实际费用产生负面影响。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 Jun;119(7):2053-2060. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000260591.82762.b5.
3
The economic cost of squamous cell cancer of the head and neck: findings from linked SEER-Medicare data.头颈部鳞状细胞癌的经济成本:基于SEER-Medicare关联数据的研究结果
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004 Nov;130(11):1269-75. doi: 10.1001/archotol.130.11.1269.
4
Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey.手术并发症的分类:一项在6336例患者队列中进行评估的新提议及一项调查结果
Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae.
5
Clinical care pathways: decreasing resource utilization in head and neck surgical patients.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999 Dec;121(6):755-9. doi: 10.1053/hn.1999.v121.a98217.
6
Development and implementation of a clinical pathway for patients undergoing total laryngectomy: impact on cost and quality of care.全喉切除术患者临床路径的制定与实施:对护理成本和质量的影响
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999 Nov;125(11):1247-51. doi: 10.1001/archotol.125.11.1247.
7
Critical paths at Alliant Health System.联合健康系统的关键路径
Qual Manag Health Care. 1995 Winter;3(2):55-64. doi: 10.1097/00019514-199503020-00008.
8
The COPD critical pathway: a case study in progress.
Qual Manag Health Care. 1995 Winter;3(2):43-54. doi: 10.1097/00019514-199503020-00007.
9
Managing critical pathway variances.管理关键路径差异。
Qual Manag Health Care. 1995 Winter;3(2):30-42. doi: 10.1097/00019514-199503020-00006.
10
Using PERT/CPM (Program Evaluation and Review Technique/Critical Path Method) to design and improve clinical processes.使用计划评审技术/关键路径法(PERT/CPM)来设计和改进临床流程。
Qual Manag Health Care. 1995 Winter;3(2):1-13. doi: 10.1097/00019514-199503020-00004.

基于算法的患者护理方案,以优化头颈部游离皮瓣患者的护理及住院情况。

Algorithm based patient care protocol to optimize patient care and inpatient stay in head and neck free flap patients.

作者信息

O'Connell Daniel A, Barber Brittany, Klein Max F, Soparlo Jeff, Al-Marzouki Hani, Harris Jeffrey R, Seikaly Hadi

机构信息

Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.

Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta Hospital, 1E4.31 8440 112th Street NW, Edmonton, AB, T6R 2B7, Canada.

出版信息

J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Nov 2;44:45. doi: 10.1186/s40463-015-0090-6.

DOI:10.1186/s40463-015-0090-6
PMID:26525293
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4631082/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine if rigid adherence (where medically appropriate) to an algorithm/checklist-based patient care pathway can reduce the duration of hospitalization and complication rates in patients undergoing head and neck reconstruction with free tissue transfer.

METHODS

Study design was a retrospective case-control study of patients undergoing major head and neck cancer resections and reconstruction at a tertiary referral centre. The intervention was rigid adherence to a pre-existing care pathway including flow algorithms and multidisciplinary checklists incorporated into patient charting and care orders. 157 patients were enrolled prospectively and were compared to 99 patients in a historical cohort. Patient charts were reviewed and information related to the patient, procedure, and post-operative course was extracted. The two groups were compared for number of major and minor complications (using the Clavien-Dindo system) and length of stay in hospital.

RESULTS

Comparing pre- and post-intervention groups, no significant difference was identified in duration of hospital stay (21.5 days vs. 20.5 days, p = 0.750), the rate of major complications was significantly higher in the pre-intervention cohort (25.3% vs. 14.0%, p = 0.031), the rate of minor complications was not significantly higher (34.3% vs 30.8%, p = 0.610).

CONCLUSION

Rigid adherence to our patient care pathway, and improved charting techniques including flow algorithms and multidisciplinary checklists has improved patient care by showing a significant reduction in the rate of major complications.

摘要

目的

确定在医学上适当的情况下,严格遵循基于算法/检查表的患者护理路径是否可以缩短接受游离组织移植进行头颈部重建患者的住院时间并降低并发症发生率。

方法

本研究设计为一项对在三级转诊中心接受头颈部癌症大手术切除及重建的患者进行的回顾性病例对照研究。干预措施是严格遵循预先存在的护理路径,包括纳入患者病历记录和护理医嘱中的流程算法和多学科检查表。前瞻性纳入了157例患者,并与历史队列中的99例患者进行比较。查阅患者病历,并提取与患者、手术及术后病程相关的信息。比较两组患者的严重及轻微并发症数量(采用Clavien-Dindo系统)和住院时间。

结果

比较干预前后两组,住院时间无显著差异(21.5天对20.5天,p = 0.750),干预前队列的严重并发症发生率显著更高(25.3%对14.0%,p = 0.031),轻微并发症发生率无显著更高(34.3%对30.8%,p = 0.610)。

结论

严格遵循我们的患者护理路径,以及改进包括流程算法和多学科检查表在内的病历记录技术,通过显著降低严重并发症发生率改善了患者护理。