Suppr超能文献

研究中的风险与风险研究:瑞典城市宫颈癌筛查多学科研究的理论与实践经验

Research on risk and risk in research: theoretical and practical experiences from a multidisciplinary study on cervical cancer screening in urban Sweden.

作者信息

Tishelman C, Forss A, Sachs L, Lundgren E L, Widmark C, Törnberg S

机构信息

Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Qual Health Res. 1999 Jan;9(1):45-60. doi: 10.1177/104973299129121686.

Abstract

This article describes a qualitative research project on secondary cancer prevention that was conducted using a multidisciplinary team and that was inspired by perspectives from feminist research and fourth-generation evaluation. A screening program for cervical cancer was investigated from the perspective of different stakeholders through a series of substudies using a variety of qualitative approaches, in order to have a broad basis for consideration and negotiation of improvements. The first sections of this article describe the theoretical and methodological basis for the project, which triangulates a variety of qualitative and quantitative research strategies, whereas the latter sections describe some of our experiences, positive and negative, as a research team (and thus also as stakeholders) in actually conducting the studies.

摘要

本文介绍了一项关于继发性癌症预防的定性研究项目,该项目由一个多学科团队开展,其灵感来自女性主义研究和第四代评估的观点。通过一系列子研究,运用多种定性方法,从不同利益相关者的角度对宫颈癌筛查项目进行了调查,以便为改进措施的考量和协商提供广泛依据。本文的前几部分描述了该项目的理论和方法基础,该基础将多种定性和定量研究策略结合使用,而后几部分则描述了我们作为研究团队(同时也是利益相关者)在实际开展研究过程中的一些正面和负面经历。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验