Tishelman C, Forss A, Sachs L, Lundgren E L, Widmark C, Törnberg S
Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Qual Health Res. 1999 Jan;9(1):45-60. doi: 10.1177/104973299129121686.
This article describes a qualitative research project on secondary cancer prevention that was conducted using a multidisciplinary team and that was inspired by perspectives from feminist research and fourth-generation evaluation. A screening program for cervical cancer was investigated from the perspective of different stakeholders through a series of substudies using a variety of qualitative approaches, in order to have a broad basis for consideration and negotiation of improvements. The first sections of this article describe the theoretical and methodological basis for the project, which triangulates a variety of qualitative and quantitative research strategies, whereas the latter sections describe some of our experiences, positive and negative, as a research team (and thus also as stakeholders) in actually conducting the studies.
本文介绍了一项关于继发性癌症预防的定性研究项目，该项目由一个多学科团队开展，其灵感来自女性主义研究和第四代评估的观点。通过一系列子研究，运用多种定性方法，从不同利益相关者的角度对宫颈癌筛查项目进行了调查，以便为改进措施的考量和协商提供广泛依据。本文的前几部分描述了该项目的理论和方法基础，该基础将多种定性和定量研究策略结合使用，而后几部分则描述了我们作为研究团队（同时也是利益相关者）在实际开展研究过程中的一些正面和负面经历。
