Lang C E, Bastian A J
Program in Physical Therapy, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63108, USA.
J Neurophysiol. 1999 Nov;82(5):2108-19. doi: 10.1152/jn.1999.82.5.2108.
We evaluated the role of the cerebellum in adapting anticipatory muscle activity during a multijointed catching task. Individuals with and without cerebellar damage caught a series of balls of different weights dropped from above. In Experiment 1 (light-heavy-light), each subject was required to catch light balls (baseline phase), heavy balls (adaptation phase), and then light balls again (postadaptation phase). Subjects were not told when the balls would be switched, and they were required to keep their hand within a vertical spatial "window" during the catch. During the series of trials, we measured three-dimensional (3-D) position and electromyogram (EMG) from the catching arm. We modeled the adaptation process using an exponential decay function; this model allowed us to dissociate adaptation from performance variability. Results from the position data show that cerebellar subjects did not adapt or adapted very slowly to the changed ball weight when compared with the control subjects. The cerebellar group required an average of 30.9 +/- 8.7 trials (mean +/- SE) to progress approximately two-thirds of the way through the adaptation compared with 1.7 +/- 0.2 trials for the control group. Only control subjects showed a negative aftereffect indicating storage of the adaptation. No difference in performance variability existed between the two groups. EMG data show that control subjects increased their anticipatory muscle activity in the flexor muscles of the arm to control the momentum of the ball at impact. Cerebellar subjects were unable to differentially increase the anticipatory muscle activity across three joints to perform the task successfully. In Experiment 2 (heavy-light-heavy), we tested to see whether the rate of adaptation changed when adapting to a light ball versus a heavy ball. Subjects caught the heavy balls (baseline phase), the light balls (adaptation phase), and then heavy balls again (postadaptation phase). Comparison of rates of adaptation between Experiment 1 and Experiment 2 showed that the rate of adaptation was unchanged whether adapting to a light ball or a heavy ball. Given these findings, we conclude that the cerebellum is important in generating the appropriate anticipatory muscle activity across multiple muscles and modifying it in response to changing demands though trial-and-error practice.
我们评估了小脑在多关节接球任务中调节预期肌肉活动的作用。有和没有小脑损伤的个体接住一系列从上方掉落的不同重量的球。在实验1(轻-重-轻)中,要求每个受试者接住轻球(基线阶段)、重球(适应阶段),然后再接住轻球(适应后阶段)。受试者未被告知何时会更换球,并且在接球过程中他们需要将手保持在垂直空间“窗口”内。在一系列试验中,我们测量了接球手臂的三维(3-D)位置和肌电图(EMG)。我们使用指数衰减函数对适应过程进行建模;该模型使我们能够将适应与表现变异性区分开来。位置数据的结果表明,与对照组相比,小脑损伤的受试者对接球重量的变化没有适应或适应非常缓慢。小脑损伤组平均需要30.9±8.7次试验(平均值±标准误)才能在适应过程中前进约三分之二,而对照组为1.7±0.2次试验。只有对照组表现出负后效,表明适应的存储。两组之间在表现变异性方面没有差异。肌电图数据表明,对照组增加了手臂屈肌的预期肌肉活动,以控制球在撞击时的动量。小脑损伤的受试者无法在三个关节上差异地增加预期肌肉活动以成功完成任务。在实验2(重-轻-重)中,我们测试了适应轻球与重球时适应率是否会发生变化。受试者接住重球(基线阶段)、轻球(适应阶段),然后再接住重球(适应后阶段)。实验1和实验2之间适应率的比较表明,无论适应轻球还是重球,适应率都没有变化。基于这些发现,我们得出结论,小脑对于在多个肌肉中产生适当的预期肌肉活动并通过反复试验练习根据不断变化的需求对其进行调整很重要。