Ardila A
Instituto Colombiano de Neuropsicologia, Bogotà, Colombia.
Neuropsychol Rev. 1999 Sep;9(3):117-36. doi: 10.1023/a:1021674303922.
This paper proposes that current psychometric intelligence tests are limited in evaluating cognitive activity. From a neuropsychological perspective, they fail to measure some fundamental cognitive abilities such as executive functions, memory, and visuospatial abilities. The analysis of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale presented shows that the original rationale for selecting the specific subtests included in the WAIS was unclear. The concept of a g factor in cognition is also analyzed, with the conclusion that the g factor continues to be controversial. The value of intelligence tests in predicting school performance is also criticized. It is proposed that the psychometric concept of general intelligence should be deleted from cognitive and neurological sciences. Finally, it is proposed that, in the future, neuropsychological instruments sensitive to more specific cognitive abilities replace current psychometric intelligence tests.
本文提出,当前的心理测量智力测试在评估认知活动方面存在局限性。从神经心理学的角度来看,它们未能测量一些基本的认知能力,如执行功能、记忆和视觉空间能力。对韦氏智力量表的分析表明,选择WAIS中特定子测验的最初理由并不明确。文中还分析了认知中g因素的概念,得出的结论是g因素仍然存在争议。智力测试在预测学业成绩方面的价值也受到了批评。有人提议,应从认知科学和神经科学中删除一般智力的心理测量概念。最后,有人提议,未来对更特定认知能力敏感的神经心理学工具应取代当前的心理测量智力测试。