• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于预测根治性前列腺切除术后前列腺癌进展的基因工程神经网络

Genetically engineered neural networks for predicting prostate cancer progression after radical prostatectomy.

作者信息

Potter S R, Miller M C, Mangold L A, Jones K A, Epstein J I, Veltri R W, Partin A W

机构信息

James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins Medical Institution, Baltimore, Maryland 21287-2101, USA.

出版信息

Urology. 1999 Nov;54(5):791-5. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(99)00328-3.

DOI:10.1016/s0090-4295(99)00328-3
PMID:10565735
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To use pathologic, morphometric, DNA ploidy, and clinical data to develop and test a genetically engineered neural network (GENN) for the prediction of biochemical (prostate-specific antigen [PSA]) progression after radical prostatectomy in a select group of men with clinically localized prostate cancer.

METHODS

Two hundred fourteen men who underwent anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer were selected on the basis of adequate follow-up, pathologic criteria indicating an intermediate risk of progression, and availability of archival tissue. The median age was 58.9 years (range 40 to 87). Men with Gleason score 5 to 7 and clinical Stage T1b-T2c tumors were included. Follow-up was a median of 9.5 years. Three GENNs were developed using pathologic findings (Gleason score, extraprostatic extension, surgical margin status), age, quantitative nuclear grade (QNG), and DNA ploidy. These networks were developed using three randomly selected training (n = 136) and testing (n = 35) sets. Different variable subsets were compared for the ability to maximize prediction of progression. Both standard logistic regression and Cox regression analyses were used concurrently to calculate progression risk.

RESULTS

Biochemical (PSA) progression occurred in 84 men (40%), with a median time to progression of 48 months (range 1 to 168). GENN models were trained using inputs consisting of (a) pathologic features and patient age; (b) QNG and DNA ploidy; and (c) all variables combined. These GENN models achieved an average accuracy of 74.4%, 63.1 %, and 73.5%, respectively, for the prediction of progression in the training sets. In the testing sets, the three GENN models had an accuracy of 74.3%, 80.0%, and 78.1%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The GENN models developed show promise in predicting progression in select groups of men after radical prostatectomy. Neural networks using QNG and DNA ploidy as input variables performed as well as networks using Gleason score and staging information. All GENN models were superior to logistic regression modeling and to Cox regression analysis in prediction of PSA progression. The development of models using improved input variables and imaging systems in larger, well-characterized patient groups with long-term follow-up is ongoing.

摘要

目的

运用病理学、形态计量学、DNA倍体分析及临床数据,开发并测试一种基因工程神经网络(GENN),用于预测一组经选择的临床局限性前列腺癌男性患者根治性前列腺切除术后的生化(前列腺特异性抗原[PSA])进展情况。

方法

基于充分的随访、提示进展风险中等的病理标准以及存档组织的可用性,选择214例因临床局限性前列腺癌接受耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术的男性患者。中位年龄为58.9岁(范围40至87岁)。纳入Gleason评分5至7分且临床分期为T1b - T2c期肿瘤的患者。随访时间中位数为9.5年。利用病理结果(Gleason评分、前列腺外扩展、手术切缘状态)、年龄、定量核分级(QNG)和DNA倍体分析开发了三个GENN。这些网络是使用三个随机选择的训练集(n = 136)和测试集(n = 35)开发的。比较不同变量子集在最大化预测进展方面的能力。同时使用标准逻辑回归和Cox回归分析来计算进展风险。

结果

84例男性患者(40%)出现生化(PSA)进展,进展的中位时间为48个月(范围1至168个月)。GENN模型使用以下输入进行训练:(a)病理特征和患者年龄;(b)QNG和DNA倍体分析;(c)所有变量组合。这些GENN模型在训练集中预测进展的平均准确率分别为74.4%、63.1%和73.5%。在测试集中,三个GENN模型的准确率分别为74.3%、80.0%和78.1%。

结论

所开发的GENN模型在预测根治性前列腺切除术后特定男性群体的进展方面显示出前景。使用QNG和DNA倍体分析作为输入变量的神经网络与使用Gleason评分和分期信息的网络表现相当。在预测PSA进展方面,所有GENN模型均优于逻辑回归建模和Cox回归分析。目前正在更大规模、特征明确且有长期随访的患者群体中,利用改进的输入变量和成像系统开发模型。

相似文献

1
Genetically engineered neural networks for predicting prostate cancer progression after radical prostatectomy.用于预测根治性前列腺切除术后前列腺癌进展的基因工程神经网络
Urology. 1999 Nov;54(5):791-5. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(99)00328-3.
2
A neural network predicts progression for men with gleason score 3+4 versus 4+3 tumors after radical prostatectomy.神经网络可预测根治性前列腺切除术后 Gleason 评分 3+4 与 4+3 肿瘤男性患者的病情进展。
Urology. 2000 Dec 20;56(6):994-9. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(00)00815-3.
3
Preoperative neural network using combined magnetic resonance imaging variables, prostate-specific antigen, and gleason score for predicting prostate cancer biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.使用磁共振成像综合变量、前列腺特异性抗原和 Gleason 评分的术前神经网络预测根治性前列腺切除术后前列腺癌生化复发情况。
Urology. 2004 Dec;64(6):1165-70. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.06.030.
4
Quantitative alterations in nuclear structure predict prostate carcinoma distant metastasis and death in men with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.核结构的定量改变可预测根治性前列腺切除术后生化复发男性的前列腺癌远处转移和死亡情况。
Cancer. 2003 Dec 15;98(12):2583-91. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11852.
5
Preoperative neural network using combined magnetic resonance imaging variables, prostate-specific antigen, and Gleason score to predict positive surgical margins.使用磁共振成像变量、前列腺特异性抗原和 Gleason 评分联合构建术前神经网络以预测手术切缘阳性情况。
Urology. 2004 Sep;64(3):516-21. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.04.027.
6
Role of microvessel density in predicting recurrence in pathologic Stage T3 prostatic adenocarcinoma.微血管密度在预测病理分期为T3期前列腺腺癌复发中的作用。
Urology. 1999 Sep;54(3):479-85. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(99)00202-2.
7
Radical prostatectomy for incidental (stage T1a-T1b) prostate cancer: analysis of predictors for residual disease and biochemical recurrence.根治性前列腺切除术治疗偶发性(T1a-T1b期)前列腺癌:残余疾病和生化复发的预测因素分析。
Eur Urol. 2008 Jul;54(1):118-25. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.02.018. Epub 2008 Feb 26.
8
Lack of association of prostate carcinoma nuclear grading with prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy.前列腺癌核分级与根治性前列腺切除术后前列腺特异性抗原复发之间无相关性。
J Urol. 2001 Dec;166(6):2193-7.
9
PSA doubling time as a predictor of clinical progression after biochemical failure following radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.前列腺癌根治术后生化复发后,前列腺特异抗原(PSA)倍增时间作为临床进展的预测指标。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2001 Jun;76(6):576-81. doi: 10.4065/76.6.576.
10
Ability to predict biochemical progression using Gleason score and a computer-generated quantitative nuclear grade derived from cancer cell nuclei.利用Gleason评分和源自癌细胞核的计算机生成的定量核分级来预测生化进展的能力。
Urology. 1996 Nov;48(5):685-91. doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(96)00370-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of a deep learning system for predicting biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer.用于预测前列腺癌生化复发的深度学习系统的开发。
BMC Cancer. 2025 Feb 10;25(1):232. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-13628-9.
2
Predicting Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer Post-Prostatectomy Using Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review.使用人工智能预测前列腺切除术后前列腺癌的生化复发:一项系统综述。
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Oct 25;16(21):3596. doi: 10.3390/cancers16213596.
3
A systematic review of the applications of Expert Systems (ES) and machine learning (ML) in clinical urology.
专家系统(ES)和机器学习(ML)在临床泌尿外科应用的系统评价。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Jul 22;21(1):223. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01585-9.
4
Chromatin changes predict recurrence after radical prostatectomy.染色质变化可预测前列腺癌根治术后的复发情况。
Br J Cancer. 2016 May 24;114(11):1243-50. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2016.96. Epub 2016 Apr 28.
5
Risk prediction models for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy using prostate-specific antigen and Gleason score.使用前列腺特异性抗原和 Gleason 评分的前列腺癌根治术后生化复发风险预测模型。
Asian J Androl. 2014 Nov-Dec;16(6):897-901. doi: 10.4103/1008-682X.129940.
6
Artificial neural networks and prostate cancer--tools for diagnosis and management.人工神经网络与前列腺癌——诊断与治疗工具。
Nat Rev Urol. 2013 Mar;10(3):174-82. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2013.9. Epub 2013 Feb 12.
7
Nuclear morphometry, nucleomics and prostate cancer progression.核形态计量学、核组学与前列腺癌进展。
Asian J Androl. 2012 May;14(3):375-84. doi: 10.1038/aja.2011.148. Epub 2012 Apr 16.
8
Prediction of biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy in men with prostate cancer by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: initial results.基于磁共振弥散加权成像预测前列腺癌根治术后患者的生化复发:初步结果。
Eur Radiol. 2011 May;21(5):1111-8. doi: 10.1007/s00330-010-1999-9. Epub 2010 Nov 3.
9
Critical review of prostate cancer predictive tools.前列腺癌预测工具的批判性评价。
Future Oncol. 2009 Dec;5(10):1555-84. doi: 10.2217/fon.09.121.
10
Applications of machine learning in cancer prediction and prognosis.机器学习在癌症预测和预后中的应用。
Cancer Inform. 2007 Feb 11;2:59-77.