Curran J M, Robertson B, Vignaux G A
Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh 27695-8203, USA.
Genetica. 1999;105(2):211-3. doi: 10.1023/a:1003720906943.
In a recent article Levine and Kobilinsky (1997) point out that current methods in forensic DNA 'identification' are inadequate because the commercial kits commonly used in forensic practice do not detect the true genotype, but rather a genotype based on convenient categorization. For this reason, Levine and Kobilinsky argue that statistics attached to such categorizations are invalid. The authors believe that the arguments of Levine and Kobilinsky are logically flawed.
在最近的一篇文章中,莱文和科比林斯基(1997年)指出,目前法医DNA“鉴定”方法并不充分,因为法医实践中常用的商业试剂盒并不能检测到真正的基因型,而是基于便捷分类的基因型。因此,莱文和科比林斯基认为,此类分类所附带的统计数据是无效的。作者认为莱文和科比林斯基的论点存在逻辑缺陷。