Suppr超能文献

两剂雾化丙酸氟替卡松和安慰剂对重度慢性哮喘患者的口服类固醇节省效应

Oral steroid-sparing effect of two doses of nebulized fluticasone propionate and placebo in patients with severe chronic asthma.

作者信息

Westbroek J, Saarelainen S, Laher M, O'Brien J, Barnacle H, Efthimiou J

机构信息

Glaxo Wellcome Research and Development, U.K.

出版信息

Respir Med. 1999 Oct;93(10):689-99. doi: 10.1016/s0954-6111(99)90035-5.

Abstract

Inhaled steroids, delivered by metered dose aerosol and dry powder inhalers, have proved effective in reducing the need for oral steroids in patients with oral steroid-dependant asthma. This randomized, double-blind study, compared the efficacy and tolerability of nebulized fluticasone propionate (FP Nebules), 2 mg b.d. (FP 4 mg) and 0.5 mg b.d. (FP 1 mg) with placebo, on the reduction of oral steroid requirement in 301 adult patients with oral steroid-dependent asthma. Primary efficacy was assessed by the reduction in daily oral steroid dose. Secondary efficacy parameters included daily diary card peak expiratory flow (PEF), day and night-time symptoms and clinic lung function measurements. Safety was assessed by adverse event monitoring and serum cortisol levels. After 12 weeks of treatment the adjusted mean +/- SEM reduction in oral prednisolone was significantly greater in the FP 4 mg group (4.44 +/- 0.98 mg day-1) compared with FP 1 mg (2.16 +/- 1.00 mg day-1, P = 0.039) and placebo (1.20 +/- 1.02 mg day-1, P = 0.004). A higher percentage of patients discontinued the use of oral steroids with FP 4 mg (37%) compared with FP 1 mg (26%, P = 0.038) and placebo (18%, P < 0.001). Following treatment, the adjusted mean morning PEF showed a trend in favour of FP 4 mg (280 +/- 41 min-1) compared with placebo (270 +/- 51 min-1, P = 0.053) and the evening PEF was significantly higher with FP 4 mg (305 +/- 41 min-1) compared with FP 1 mg (292 +/- 41 min-1, P = 0.010). FP 4 mg resulted in a significantly higher percentage of days when the patients were free from daytime (P = 0.036) and night-time (P = 0.021) wheeze, compared with placebo. Significantly fewer patients withdrew from the FP 4 mg group compared with the other two groups (vs. FP 1 mg, P = 0.003; vs. placebo, P = 0.032). All three treatments were well tolerated and the incidence of adverse events was similar between the groups. FP Nebules at a daily dose of between 1 and 4 mg are a safe and effective means of reducing the oral steroid requirement of patients with chronic oral steroid dependent asthma.

摘要

通过定量气雾剂和干粉吸入器递送的吸入性类固醇已被证明可有效减少口服类固醇依赖型哮喘患者对口服类固醇的需求。这项随机、双盲研究比较了雾化丙酸氟替卡松(氟替卡松雾化吸入剂),每日两次,每次2毫克(氟替卡松4毫克)和每日两次,每次0.5毫克(氟替卡松1毫克)与安慰剂相比,对301例口服类固醇依赖型成年哮喘患者减少口服类固醇需求的疗效和耐受性。主要疗效通过每日口服类固醇剂量的减少来评估。次要疗效参数包括每日日记卡上的呼气峰值流速(PEF)、白天和夜间症状以及临床肺功能测量。通过不良事件监测和血清皮质醇水平评估安全性。治疗12周后,氟替卡松4毫克组口服泼尼松龙的调整后平均±标准误减少量(4.44±0.98毫克/天)显著大于氟替卡松1毫克组(2.16±1.00毫克/天,P = 0.039)和安慰剂组(1.20±1.02毫克/天,P = 0.004)。与氟替卡松1毫克组(26%,P = 0.038)和安慰剂组(18%,P < 0.001)相比,更高比例的患者使用氟替卡松4毫克后停止使用口服类固醇。治疗后,与安慰剂组(270±51升/分钟,P = 0.053)相比,调整后的平均早晨PEF显示出有利于氟替卡松4毫克组(280±41升/分钟)的趋势,并且与氟替卡松1毫克组(292±41升/分钟,P = 0.010)相比,氟替卡松4毫克组的夜间PEF显著更高(305±41升/分钟)。与安慰剂相比,氟替卡松4毫克组患者白天(P = 0.036)和夜间(P = 0.02)无喘息的天数百分比显著更高。与其他两组相比,氟替卡松4毫克组退出研究的患者明显更少(与氟替卡松1毫克组相比,P = 0.003;与安慰剂组相比,P = 0.032)。所有三种治疗耐受性良好,各组不良事件发生率相似。每日剂量为1至4毫克的氟替卡松雾化吸入剂是减少慢性口服类固醇依赖型哮喘患者口服类固醇需求的一种安全有效的方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验