Suppr超能文献

高剂量丙酸氟替卡松(每日1毫克)与丙酸氟替卡松(每日2毫克)或布地奈德(每日1.6毫克)治疗慢性重度哮喘患者的疗效比较。国际研究小组。

High dose fluticasone propionate, 1 mg daily, versus fluticasone propionate, 2 mg daily, or budesonide, 1.6 mg daily, in patients with chronic severe asthma. International Study Group.

作者信息

Ayres J G, Bateman E D, Lundbäck B, Harris T A

机构信息

East Birmingham Hospital, UK.

出版信息

Eur Respir J. 1995 Apr;8(4):579-86.

PMID:7664857
Abstract

Airway inflammation is now regarded as fundamental in the pathogenesis of asthma and treatment with inhaled corticosteroids has proved effective. There is a need for drugs in this category with higher topical potency but fewer side-effects than those presently available. A double-blind, parallel group study was conducted in 671 patients with severe asthma (already taking between 0.8-2.0 mg of inhaled corticosteroid daily) to compare the safety and efficacy of 6 weeks of treatment with inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP), 1 mg daily, to fluticasone propionate, 2 mg daily, and budesonide (BUD), 1.6 mg daily, delivered via a metered-dose inhaler. Peak expiratory flow (PEF), asthma symptoms, and usage of rescue medication were recorded daily by the patient. At each clinic visit (-2, 0, 3 and 6 weeks) morning serum cortisol levels, bone markers and spirometry were assessed. The changes in mean morning PEF from baseline (weeks 1-6) were: FP 2 mg daily +24 l.min-1; FP 1 mg daily +21 l.min-1; BUD 1.6 mg daily +13 l.min-1. A similar rank order for the three treatments was seen for evening PEF, clinic spirometry, reduction of diurnal PEF variation, symptom scores, and requirement for rescue bronchodilators. The mean serum cortisol levels remained well within the normal range in all three groups. Analysis of the geometric mean cortisol ratio (treatment/baseline ratio after 6 weeks treatment) showed a changed rank order, the values being: FP 1 mg daily 1.04; BUD 1.6 mg daily 0.97; FP 2 mg daily 0.88.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

气道炎症目前被认为是哮喘发病机制的基础,吸入糖皮质激素治疗已被证明有效。需要一类比现有药物具有更高局部效力但副作用更少的药物。对671例重度哮喘患者(已每日吸入0.8 - 2.0毫克糖皮质激素)进行了一项双盲平行组研究,以比较每日吸入1毫克丙酸氟替卡松(FP)、每日吸入2毫克丙酸氟替卡松和每日吸入1.6毫克布地奈德(BUD),通过定量吸入器给药6周的安全性和有效性。患者每天记录呼气峰值流速(PEF)、哮喘症状和急救药物的使用情况。每次门诊就诊时(第 -2、0、3和6周)评估早晨血清皮质醇水平、骨标志物和肺功能。从基线(第1 - 6周)开始,平均早晨PEF的变化为:每日2毫克FP增加24升/分钟;每日1毫克FP增加21升/分钟;每日1.6毫克BUD增加13升/分钟。三种治疗方法在夜间PEF、门诊肺功能、昼夜PEF变化减少、症状评分和急救支气管扩张剂需求方面也呈现出类似的排序。所有三组的平均血清皮质醇水平均保持在正常范围内。对几何平均皮质醇比率(6周治疗后的治疗/基线比率)的分析显示排序发生了变化,数值分别为:每日1毫克FP为1.04;每日1.6毫克BUD为0.97;每日2毫克FP为0.88。(摘要截断于250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验