• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双层手套价值的电子评估

Electronic evaluation of the value of double gloving.

作者信息

Caillot J L, Côte C, Abidi H, Fabry J

机构信息

Surgical Emergency Service, Centre hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Pierre Bénite, France.

出版信息

Br J Surg. 1999 Nov;86(11):1387-90. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.01266.x.

DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.01266.x
PMID:10583283
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Breakdown of the surgeon-patient barrier represents a risk for transmission of infectious disease. Such breakdowns are frequently not recognized by the surgical team. The protection afforded by double gloving under normal operating conditions was evaluated.

METHODS

An electronic device detected breakdown of the surgeon-patient barrier in a series of 80 surgical procedures, randomly assigned to either double or single gloving. Fluid contact due to glove perforation, porosity or gown wetting was recorded during 151 individual surgeon episodes covering 238 operator-hours. Surgical procedures were called superficial for incisions of less than 10 cm.

RESULTS

Double gloving reduced the number of perforation and porosity alarms twofold in both superficial and deep surgical procedures. Deep procedures carried a sevenfold increased risk of barrier breakdown compared with superficial procedures, the risk being greatest for the principal operator.

CONCLUSION

Without electronic detection, a large majority of barrier breakdowns would remain undetected by the surgical team and lead to prolonged contact with potentially contaminating body fluids. The use of double gloving provides real protection against such contamination risks.

摘要

背景

医患屏障的破损存在传染病传播风险。手术团队常常意识不到此类破损情况。我们评估了在正常手术条件下双层手套提供的防护作用。

方法

一种电子设备在80例外科手术中检测医患屏障的破损情况,这些手术被随机分配采用双层或单层手套。在涵盖238个术者工时的151次术者个人操作期间,记录因手套穿孔、孔隙或手术衣浸湿导致的液体接触情况。手术切口小于10厘米的手术被称为浅表手术。

结果

在浅表和深部外科手术中,双层手套使穿孔和孔隙警报数量减少了一半。与浅表手术相比,深部手术的屏障破损风险增加了7倍,主要术者面临的风险最大。

结论

若无电子检测,手术团队绝大多数情况下都无法察觉屏障破损,这会导致与潜在污染体液的长时间接触。使用双层手套可切实防范此类污染风险。

相似文献

1
Electronic evaluation of the value of double gloving.双层手套价值的电子评估
Br J Surg. 1999 Nov;86(11):1387-90. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.01266.x.
2
[Electronic detection of breaks in the surgeon-patient barrier. Evaluation of protective clothing in visceral surgery].[外科医生与患者屏障破裂的电子检测。内脏手术中防护服的评估]
Ann Chir. 2000 May;125(4):358-62. doi: 10.1016/s0003-3944(00)00208-x.
3
Efficacy of double versus single gloving in protecting the operating team.双层手套与单层手套在保护手术团队方面的效果比较
Aust N Z J Surg. 1990 Mar;60(3):171-5.
4
Exploring the benefits of double gloving during surgery.探索手术中双层手套的益处。
AORN J. 2012 Mar;95(3):328-36. doi: 10.1016/j.aorn.2011.04.027.
5
Double gloving as self protection in abdominal surgery.腹部手术中双重手套作为自我防护措施
Eur J Surg. 1997 Mar;163(3):163-7.
6
Prospective study of glove perforation in obstetrical and gynecological operations: are we safe enough?妇产科手术中手套穿孔的前瞻性研究:我们是否足够安全?
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2004 Aug;30(4):319-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2004.00201.x.
7
Prospective randomized assessment of single versus double-gloving for general surgical procedures.普通外科手术中单手套与双手套使用的前瞻性随机评估。
Niger J Med. 2009 Jan-Mar;18(1):73-4.
8
Incidence of glove perforations in gastrointestinal surgery and the protective effect of double gloves: a prospective, randomised controlled study.胃肠手术中手套穿孔的发生率及双层手套的防护作用:一项前瞻性随机对照研究。
Eur J Surg. 2000 Apr;166(4):293-5. doi: 10.1080/110241500750009113.
9
Randomized controlled trial of glove perforation in single- and double-gloving in episiotomy repair after vaginal delivery.阴道分娩后会阴切开术修复中单手套和双手套手套穿孔的随机对照试验。
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2004 Oct;30(5):354-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2004.00208.x.
10
Intraoperative glove perforation--single versus double gloving in protection against skin contamination.术中手套穿孔——单层手套与双层手套预防皮肤污染的比较
Postgrad Med J. 2001 Jul;77(909):458-60. doi: 10.1136/pmj.77.909.458.

引用本文的文献

1
Perforation of Surgical Gloves during Lower Extremity Fracture Surgery and Hip Joint Replacement Surgery.下肢骨折手术及髋关节置换手术中手术手套穿孔情况
Hip Pelvis. 2015 Mar;27(1):17-22. doi: 10.5371/hp.2015.27.1.17. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
2
Gloves, extra gloves or special types of gloves for preventing percutaneous exposure injuries in healthcare personnel.手套、额外的手套或用于预防医护人员经皮暴露损伤的特殊类型手套。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Mar 7;2014(3):CD009573. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009573.pub2.
3
Double gloving to reduce surgical cross-infection.
双层手套可减少手术交叉感染。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jul 19;2006(3):CD003087. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003087.pub2.
4
Anticipated detection of imminent surgeon-patient barrier breaches. A prospective randomized controlled trial using an indicator underglove system.预期检测即将出现的医患屏障突破情况。一项使用指示性手套内系统的前瞻性随机对照试验。
World J Surg. 2006 Jan;30(1):134-8. doi: 10.1007/s00268-005-0172-0.
5
Randomized clinical trial comparing blunt tapered and standard needles in closing abdominal fascia.比较钝头锥形针和标准针闭合腹部筋膜的随机临床试验。
World J Surg. 2005 Apr;29(4):441-5; discussion 445. doi: 10.1007/s00268-004-7586-y.
6
Incidence of glove failure during orthopedic operations and the protective effect of double gloves.骨科手术中手套破损的发生率及双层手套的防护作用。
J Natl Med Assoc. 2003 Dec;95(12):1184-8.
7
[HCV, HBV and HIV infections: risk for surgeon and staff. Results and consequences of routine screening in emergency patients].[丙型肝炎病毒、乙型肝炎病毒和人类免疫缺陷病毒感染:外科医生及工作人员面临的风险。急诊患者常规筛查的结果及后果]
Chirurg. 2003 Nov;74(11):1026-33. doi: 10.1007/s00104-003-0741-4.
8
Surgeon-patient barrier efficiency monitored with an electronic device in three surgical settings.
World J Surg. 2001 Sep;25(9):1101-8. doi: 10.1007/BF03215854.
9
Inadvertent prolonged fluid contact: an unappreciated professional risk for surgeons.意外的长时间液体接触:外科医生未被重视的职业风险。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2000;16(7):687. doi: 10.1023/a:1007690813508.