Gerrish K
Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK.
J Adv Nurs. 1999 Dec;30(6):1263-71. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1999.01213.x.
This paper reports on the selected findings from a larger ethnographic study of the provision of district nursing care to patients from different ethnic backgrounds. The two-stage study was undertaken in an English community National Health Service (NHS) trust serving an ethnically diverse population. The first stage comprised an organizational profile in order to analyse the local policy context, including specific responses to ethnic diversity. Data were collected by means of in-depth interviews with managers. The second stage entailed a participant observational study focusing on six district nursing teams. Purposive sampling was used to identify four teams with high minority ethnic caseloads and two teams with predominately white ethnic majority caseloads. Interview transcripts and field-notes were analysed by drawing upon the principles of dimensional analysis. The paper focuses upon institutional influences on the provision of care to minority ethnic communities. An analysis of the allocation of district nursing resource to different general practitioner (GP) practices identified marked inequalities in the district nursing provision which impacted upon the services provided to minority ethnic patients. Single-handed, inner city GP practices with a large minority ethnic practice population received a much smaller allocation of nursing staff than single group practices serving a smaller and predominately white practice population. The reasons why this situation existed are explored and an explanation offered as to why it had not been rectified. Observation of caseload management indicated that despite differences in the size of the practice populations served by the respective teams, all patients referred for nursing care received it. However, several covert processes appeared to limit the caseload size of those teams with large practice populations so that it remained manageable within the limited nursing resource available. It is concluded that although nurses at an individual level did not appear overtly to disadvantage minority ethnic patients, institutional forces conspired to perpetuate the disadvantage experienced by minority ethnic communities.
本文报告了一项规模更大的人种学研究的部分选定结果,该研究聚焦于为不同种族背景的患者提供社区护理服务。这项分两阶段进行的研究在英国一个社区国民医疗服务体系(NHS)信托机构开展,该机构服务的人群种族多样。第一阶段包括一份组织概况分析,目的是剖析当地政策背景,包括对种族多样性的具体应对措施。数据通过对管理人员进行深度访谈收集。第二阶段是一项参与式观察研究,重点关注六个社区护理团队。采用目的抽样法确定了四个少数族裔病例量高的团队和两个白人病例量占主导的团队。访谈记录和实地笔记依据维度分析原则进行分析。本文重点关注制度对为少数族裔社区提供护理服务的影响。对社区护理资源分配到不同全科医生(GP)诊所的分析表明,社区护理服务存在明显不平等现象,这对为少数族裔患者提供的服务产生了影响。与服务白人为主、规模较小的单一团队诊所相比,服务少数族裔人口众多的市中心单人全科医生诊所获得的护理人员分配要少得多。本文探讨了这种情况存在的原因,并对为何未得到纠正给出了解释。对病例量管理的观察表明,尽管各团队服务的诊所人口规模不同,但所有转诊接受护理的患者都得到了护理。然而,一些隐蔽的过程似乎限制了服务大量诊所人口的团队的病例量规模,以便在有限的护理资源范围内保持可控。研究得出结论,尽管个体层面的护士并未明显对少数族裔患者不利,但制度力量共同作用,使少数族裔社区持续处于不利地位。