Bowler D M, Briskman J A, Grice S
Department of Psychology, City University, London.
J Genet Psychol. 1999 Dec;160(4):443-60. doi: 10.1080/00221329909595558.
Two experiments were conducted in which a variant of J. McGarrigle and M. Donaldson's (1975) "Naughty Teddy" intervention was applied to children's understanding of false drawings and false beliefs. The results showed that preschool children's understanding of the contents of an out-of-date drawing improved when the drawing was made by a capricious agent ("Naughty Snakey" glove puppet) rather than by the experimenter. The children's performance on a false belief task also improved when the events that set up the false belief were the result of the actions of the glove puppet. The results are discussed in terms of the role of children's sensitivity to the pragmatics of interactions in their development of a theory of mind.
进行了两项实验,其中将J. 麦加里格尔和M. 唐纳森(1975年)“调皮泰迪”干预的一个变体应用于儿童对错误图画和错误信念的理解。结果表明,当一幅过时的图画是由一个反复无常的主体(“调皮的蛇形”手套木偶)而非实验者绘制时,学龄前儿童对该图画内容的理解有所提高。当引发错误信念的事件是手套木偶行动的结果时,儿童在错误信念任务上的表现也有所改善。根据儿童对互动语用学的敏感性在其心理理论发展中的作用对结果进行了讨论。