Bode P J, Edwards M J, Kruit M C, van Vugt A B
Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999 Apr;172(4):905-11. doi: 10.2214/ajr.172.4.10587119.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of sonography in our algorithm when differentiating patients with blunt abdominal trauma who need immediate surgery from patients who would benefit from further diagnostic workup or who need no treatment.
We performed abdominal sonography as the primary screening tool in 1671 consecutive patients in our prospective study. Radiologists performed sonography in the trauma room within minutes of the arrival of each patient. Hemodynamic instability in conjunction with positive sonographic findings led to emergency laparotomy. Otherwise, positive sonographic findings warranted additional diagnostic tests. Observing free fluid or organ injury caused us to categorize sonographic findings as positive.
Sonography correctly identified all patients requiring emergency laparotomy. No inconclusive laparotomies were performed in this group. The sensitivity of sonography for revealing intraabdominal injury was 88%, the specificity was 100%, and the accuracy was 99%. In 132 patients (8%), abdominal CT was performed. CT revealed relevant posttraumatic abnormalities in 61% of all patients. Four hundred seventy patients with negative sonographic findings were discharged approximately 12 hr after admission; two of these patients (0.4%) were mistakenly discharged. Trauma scores did not influence the efficacy of sonography.
Our algorithm that uses sonography as the primary diagnostic tool provides accurate, fast, cost-effective, and noninvasive initial management of patients with blunt abdominal trauma. Our test characteristics were excellent indicators of the need for emergency laparotomy. Sonography also achieves high values in revealing relevant injury. Our algorithm produced medically satisfactory and economically prudent management of patients with blunt abdominal trauma.
本研究的目的是评估在我们的算法中,超声检查在鉴别钝性腹部创伤患者时的有效性,这些患者中一部分需要立即手术,另一部分则可从进一步的诊断检查中获益或无需治疗。
在我们的前瞻性研究中,我们将腹部超声检查作为主要筛查工具应用于1671例连续患者。放射科医生在每位患者到达创伤室后的几分钟内进行超声检查。血流动力学不稳定并伴有阳性超声检查结果会导致急诊剖腹手术。否则,阳性超声检查结果需要进行额外的诊断测试。观察到游离液体或器官损伤使我们将超声检查结果归类为阳性。
超声检查正确识别了所有需要急诊剖腹手术的患者。该组未进行不确定的剖腹手术。超声检查显示腹腔内损伤的敏感性为88%,特异性为100%,准确性为99%。132例患者(8%)进行了腹部CT检查。CT显示所有患者中有61%存在相关的创伤后异常。470例超声检查结果为阴性的患者在入院后约12小时出院;其中两名患者(0.4%)被错误出院。创伤评分不影响超声检查的有效性。
我们以超声检查作为主要诊断工具的算法为钝性腹部创伤患者提供了准确、快速、经济高效且无创的初始管理。我们的检测特征是急诊剖腹手术需求的优秀指标。超声检查在揭示相关损伤方面也取得了很高的价值。我们的算法对钝性腹部创伤患者进行了医学上令人满意且经济上审慎的管理。