Frush D P, Spencer E B, Donnelly L F, Zheng J Y, DeLong D M, Bisset G S
Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999 Apr;172(4):1007-13. doi: 10.2214/ajr.172.4.10587137.
Manual administration of IV contrast material results in unpredictable injection rates. Our purpose was to determine the effect of bolus tracking on overall abdominal helical CT scan quality, particularly on hepatic enhancement, in children with manually administered contrast media.
We compared 33 abdominal helical CT scans of 29 children in whom bolus tracking was used with 22 CT scans of a control group of 21 children in whom bolus tracking was not used. All contrast material was administered by manual injection. Qualitative assessment was made of organ and vessel enhancement and overall scan appearance. Quantitative assessment using region-of-interest cursors was performed at three anatomic levels, and the results for the two groups of children were compared.
Qualitative comparison of enhancement parameters between the bolus tracking group (number given first) and the control group (number given second) yielded the following: splenic artifact in 9% versus 23% (p = .24); inferior vena cava flow artifact in 3% versus 27% (p = .01); scanning during the nephrographic phase in 89% versus 59% (p = .02); and good quality grade in 79% versus 64% (p = .23). Significantly greater hepatic enhancement (as measured in mean Hounsfield units) was achieved in the bolus tracking group than in the control group at the superior (48.5 versus 28.6; p < .001), middle (47.9 versus 32.3; p < .001), and inferior (48.2 versus 36.5; p = .01) levels. Hepatic enhancement increased significantly from the superior to the inferior level in the control group (p < .02), whereas enhancement was homogeneous in the bolus tracking group (p > .50).
Bolus tracking provides improved contrast enhancement, including significantly greater hepatic enhancement, during abdominal helical CT in children in whom the rate of injection of contrast material is unpredictable.
静脉注射造影剂时手动推注会导致注射速率不可预测。我们的目的是确定团注追踪对儿童手动注射造影剂后腹部螺旋CT扫描整体质量的影响,尤其是对肝脏强化的影响。
我们将29名使用团注追踪的儿童的33次腹部螺旋CT扫描与21名未使用团注追踪的对照组儿童的22次CT扫描进行了比较。所有造影剂均通过手动注射给药。对器官和血管强化以及整体扫描外观进行定性评估。使用感兴趣区光标在三个解剖层面进行定量评估,并比较两组儿童的结果。
团注追踪组(第一个数字)和对照组(第二个数字)之间强化参数的定性比较结果如下:脾脏伪影分别为9%和23%(p = 0.24);下腔静脉血流伪影分别为3%和27%(p = 0.01);肾实质期扫描分别为89%和59%(p = 0.02);质量等级良好分别为79%和64%(p = 0.23)。团注追踪组在上腹部(48.5对28.6;p < 0.001)、中腹部(47.9对32.3;p < 0.001)和下腹部(48.2对36.5;p = 0.01)层面的肝脏强化(以平均亨氏单位测量)明显高于对照组。对照组肝脏强化从上腹部到下腹部显著增加(p < 0.02),而团注追踪组强化均匀(p > 0.50)。
对于造影剂注射速率不可预测的儿童,在腹部螺旋CT检查中,团注追踪可改善造影剂强化效果,包括显著增强肝脏强化。