Suppr超能文献

现场单色阴极射线管显示系统的特性描述

Characterization of monochrome CRT display systems in the field.

作者信息

Roehrig H, Willis C E, Damento M A

机构信息

Department of Radiology, University of Arizona, Tucson 85724, USA.

出版信息

J Digit Imaging. 1999 Nov;12(4):152-65. doi: 10.1007/BF03168851.

Abstract

This article presents a review of image quality assessment methods for monochrome CRTs in the field as opposed to the laboratory. The review includes image quality programs at the University of Washington, the University of Texas at Houston, the University of Michigan, and the University of Arizona. CRT manufacturers and display-board suppliers also are concerned with image quality, particularly with respect to the life time of the CRT. The programs show that the need for image quality assessment for CRTs in the clinic is recognized. Although several experimental programs are in place, there is no universally accepted program. In fact, the clinical consequences of degraded monitor performance are not even well known and must be established. The existing programs mainly are based on the most comprehensive test pattern, the SMPTE pattern. The programs permit assessment of maximum luminance, display function, dynamic range, and contrast. They do not permit assessment of spatial resolution. There is no easy method to determine the spatial resolution in the field as precisely as desired simply because there are no visual aids (test patterns) to reliably determine loss of spatial resolution and signal-to-noise ratio using human observers. This report also presents initial and encouraging data obtained at the University of Arizona with a CCD camera. This CCD camera has the potential to be developed into an important tool for practical CRT evaluation for the clinic.

摘要

本文介绍了针对实际应用而非实验室环境下单色阴极射线管(CRT)图像质量评估方法的综述。该综述涵盖了华盛顿大学、休斯顿德克萨斯大学、密歇根大学和亚利桑那大学的图像质量项目。CRT制造商和显示板供应商也关注图像质量,尤其是CRT的使用寿命。这些项目表明,临床环境中对CRT图像质量评估的需求已得到认可。尽管有几个实验项目已经开展,但尚未有一个被普遍接受的项目。事实上,显示器性能下降的临床后果甚至还不为人所知,必须加以确定。现有的项目主要基于最全面的测试图案——SMPTE图案。这些项目允许评估最大亮度、显示功能、动态范围和对比度。但它们不允许评估空间分辨率。在实际应用中,没有简单的方法能像期望的那样精确地确定空间分辨率,因为没有视觉辅助工具(测试图案)供人类观察者可靠地确定空间分辨率的损失和信噪比。本报告还展示了亚利桑那大学使用电荷耦合器件(CCD)相机获得的初步且令人鼓舞的数据。这种CCD相机有潜力发展成为临床实际CRT评估的重要工具。

相似文献

1
Characterization of monochrome CRT display systems in the field.
J Digit Imaging. 1999 Nov;12(4):152-65. doi: 10.1007/BF03168851.
2
Characterization of color CRT display systems for monochrome applications.
J Digit Imaging. 1999 Aug;12(3):102-13. doi: 10.1007/BF03168629.
3
SoftCopy Display Quality Assurance Program at Texas Children's Hospital.
J Digit Imaging. 2002;15 Suppl 1:33-40. doi: 10.1007/s10278-002-5027-8. Epub 2002 Mar 21.
4
Cathode ray tube quality control and acceptance testing program: initial results for clinical PACS displays.
Radiographics. 2001 May-Jun;21(3):719-32. doi: 10.1148/radiographics.21.3.g01ma18719.
5
6
An interactive method of assessing the characteristics of softcopy display using observer performance tests.
J Digit Imaging. 2002;15 Suppl 1:216-8. doi: 10.1007/s10278-002-5003-3. Epub 2002 Mar 19.
7
Assessment of PACS display systems.
J Digit Imaging. 2005 Dec;18(4):287-95. doi: 10.1007/s10278-005-6974-7.
9
Practical assessment of the display performance of radiology workstations.
Br J Radiol. 2007 Apr;80(952):256-60. doi: 10.1259/bjr/82769410. Epub 2006 Oct 12.
10
Use of the SMPTE test pattern in picture archiving and communication systems.
J Digit Imaging. 1992 Feb;5(1):54-8. doi: 10.1007/BF03167824.

引用本文的文献

2
Determining the MTF of medical imaging displays using edge techniques.
J Digit Imaging. 2005 Dec;18(4):296-310. doi: 10.1007/s10278-005-6977-4.
3
Frequency and impact of high-resolution monitor failure in a filmless imaging department.
J Digit Imaging. 2000 Aug;13(3):114-8. doi: 10.1007/BF03168383.
4
Proposal of a quality-index or metric for soft copy display systems: contrast sensitivity study.
J Digit Imaging. 2003 Jun;16(2):185-202. doi: 10.1007/s10278-003-1657-8. Epub 2003 Sep 11.
5
Contrast-detail characteristic evaluations of several display devices.
J Digit Imaging. 2000 May;13(2 Suppl 1):162-7. doi: 10.1007/BF03167651.
6
Active matrix liquid crystal displays for clinical imaging: comparison with cathode ray tube displays.
J Digit Imaging. 2000 May;13(2 Suppl 1):155-61. doi: 10.1007/BF03167650.

本文引用的文献

1
Quantitative evaluation of overall electronic display quality.
J Digit Imaging. 1998 Aug;11(3 Suppl 1):180-6. doi: 10.1007/BF03168299.
2
Subtle orthopedic fractures: teleradiology workstation versus film interpretation.
Radiology. 1993 Jun;187(3):811-5. doi: 10.1148/radiology.187.3.8497636.
5
The digital radiology department of the future.
Radiol Clin North Am. 1985 Jun;23(2):349-55.
6
Test pattern for video displays and hard-copy cameras.
Radiology. 1985 Feb;154(2):519-27. doi: 10.1148/radiology.154.2.3966138.
7
The total digital radiology department: an alternative view.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1985 Feb;144(2):421-2. doi: 10.2214/ajr.144.2.421.
9
Advances in medical imaging.
Ann Intern Med. 1990 Feb 1;112(3):203-20. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-112-3-203.
10
Standardization of image quality and radiation dose in mammography.
Radiology. 1990 Mar;174(3 Pt 1):648-54. doi: 10.1148/radiology.174.3.2305044.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验