Suppr超能文献

软拷贝显示系统质量指标或度量的提议:对比敏感度研究。

Proposal of a quality-index or metric for soft copy display systems: contrast sensitivity study.

作者信息

Wang Jihong, Compton Ken, Peng Qi

机构信息

Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX 75390-9071, USA.

出版信息

J Digit Imaging. 2003 Jun;16(2):185-202. doi: 10.1007/s10278-003-1657-8. Epub 2003 Sep 11.

Abstract

In addition to the inherent qualities of a digital image, the qualities of the monitor and graphics control card as well as the viewing conditions will affect the perceived quality of an image that is displayed on a soft copy display (SD) system. With the implementation of picture archiving and communication systems (PACS), many diagnoses are being made based on images displayed on SD devices, and consequently SD quality may affect the accuracy of diagnosis. Unlike the traditional film-on-lightbox display, optimal SD system parameters are not well defined, and many issues remain unsettled. In this article, the human observer performance, as measured by contrast sensitivity, for several SD devices including an active matrix liquid crystal flat panel monitor is reported. Contrast sensitivities were measured with various display system configurations. Experimental results showed that contrast sensitivity depends on many factors such as the type of monitor, the monitor brightness, and the gamma settings of the graphics card in a complex manner. However, there is a clear correlation between the measured contrast thresholds and the gradient of the display device's luminance response curve. Based on this correlation, it is proposed to use the gradient of luminance response curve as a quality-index or metric for SD devices.

摘要

除了数字图像的固有特性外,显示器和图形控制卡的质量以及观看条件都会影响在软拷贝显示(SD)系统上显示的图像的感知质量。随着图像存档与通信系统(PACS)的实施,许多诊断是基于在SD设备上显示的图像做出的,因此SD质量可能会影响诊断的准确性。与传统的灯箱胶片显示不同,最佳的SD系统参数尚未明确界定,许多问题仍未解决。本文报告了通过对比敏感度测量的包括有源矩阵液晶平板显示器在内的几种SD设备的人体观察者性能。在各种显示系统配置下测量了对比敏感度。实验结果表明,对比敏感度以复杂的方式取决于许多因素,如显示器类型、显示器亮度和图形卡的伽马设置。然而,测量的对比阈值与显示设备的亮度响应曲线的斜率之间存在明显的相关性。基于这种相关性,建议将亮度响应曲线的斜率用作SD设备的质量指标或度量标准。

相似文献

1
Proposal of a quality-index or metric for soft copy display systems: contrast sensitivity study.
J Digit Imaging. 2003 Jun;16(2):185-202. doi: 10.1007/s10278-003-1657-8. Epub 2003 Sep 11.
2
SoftCopy Display Quality Assurance Program at Texas Children's Hospital.
J Digit Imaging. 2002;15 Suppl 1:33-40. doi: 10.1007/s10278-002-5027-8. Epub 2002 Mar 21.
5
Optimization of reading conditions for flat panel displays.
J Digit Imaging. 2006 Jun;19(2):181-7. doi: 10.1007/s10278-006-9710-z.
6
A practical approach to soft-copy display consistency for PC-based review workstations.
Br J Radiol. 2003 Sep;76(909):648-52. doi: 10.1259/bjr/25693100.
7
Image quality assurance of soft copy display systems.
J Digit Imaging. 2005 Dec;18(4):280-6. doi: 10.1007/s10278-005-6705-0.
8
An interactive method of assessing the characteristics of softcopy display using observer performance tests.
J Digit Imaging. 2002;15 Suppl 1:216-8. doi: 10.1007/s10278-002-5003-3. Epub 2002 Mar 19.
9
Contrast-detail characteristic evaluations of several display devices.
J Digit Imaging. 2000 May;13(2 Suppl 1):162-7. doi: 10.1007/BF03167651.
10
Assessment of PACS display systems.
J Digit Imaging. 2005 Dec;18(4):287-95. doi: 10.1007/s10278-005-6974-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Human contrast-detail performance with declining contrast.
Med Phys. 2012 Sep;39(9):5446-56. doi: 10.1118/1.4742851.
2
Comparison of the commercial color LCD and the medical monochrome LCD using randomized object test patterns.
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e37769. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037769. Epub 2012 May 31.
4
Comparison of color LCD and medical-grade monochrome LCD displays in diagnostic radiology.
J Digit Imaging. 2007 Jun;20(2):114-21. doi: 10.1007/s10278-007-9028-5.
5
Assessment of PACS display systems.
J Digit Imaging. 2005 Dec;18(4):287-95. doi: 10.1007/s10278-005-6974-7.
6
Image quality assurance of soft copy display systems.
J Digit Imaging. 2005 Dec;18(4):280-6. doi: 10.1007/s10278-005-6705-0.

本文引用的文献

1
An interactive method of assessing the characteristics of softcopy display using observer performance tests.
J Digit Imaging. 2002;15 Suppl 1:216-8. doi: 10.1007/s10278-002-5003-3. Epub 2002 Mar 19.
2
Contrast-detail characteristic evaluations of several display devices.
J Digit Imaging. 2000 May;13(2 Suppl 1):162-7. doi: 10.1007/BF03167651.
3
Characterization of monochrome CRT display systems in the field.
J Digit Imaging. 1999 Nov;12(4):152-65. doi: 10.1007/BF03168851.
5
Image quality degradation by light scattering in display devices.
J Digit Imaging. 1999 May;12(2):50-9. doi: 10.1007/BF03168843.
6
Image quality assurance for CRT display systems--Part II.
J Digit Imaging. 1999 May;12(2):49. doi: 10.1007/BF03168842.
7
Image quality assurance for CRT display systems.
J Digit Imaging. 1999 Feb;12(1):1-2. doi: 10.1007/BF03168620.
9
Image Quality of CRT displays and the effect of brightness of diagnosis of mammograms.
J Digit Imaging. 1998 Aug;11(3 Suppl 1):187-8. doi: 10.1007/BF03168300.
10
Quantitative evaluation of overall electronic display quality.
J Digit Imaging. 1998 Aug;11(3 Suppl 1):180-6. doi: 10.1007/BF03168299.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验