Aldrich John E, Rutledge John D
Department of Radiology, Vancouver Hospital, 899 West 12th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada.
J Digit Imaging. 2005 Dec;18(4):287-95. doi: 10.1007/s10278-005-6974-7.
This work describes our experience in reviewing the performance criteria for display systems and how we have implemented a practical approach to the assessment of the workstation environment in a large tertiary care hospital. The acceptance criteria contained in the draft report of Topic Group 18 of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) were used as a basis for assessment of primary and secondary displays. A telescopic photometer was used to measure the maximum luminance and the contrast ratio of the image for the displays used in our radiology department and in the operating and emergency rooms using the standard Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers (SMPTE) pattern, in ambient light and with light decreased as much as possible. About half of the displays met the AAPM criteria for minimum luminance and contrast ratio in low light. None of the systems met the contrast ratio criteria in ambient light. The challenges in improving the performance and calibrating displays are discussed.
这项工作描述了我们在审查显示系统性能标准方面的经验,以及我们如何在一家大型三级护理医院实施一种评估工作站环境的实用方法。美国医学物理学家协会(AAPM)第18专题组报告草案中包含的验收标准被用作评估主显示屏和副显示屏的基础。我们使用伸缩式光度计,按照电影电视工程师协会(SMPTE)的标准图案,在环境光下以及尽可能降低光线的情况下,测量了我们放射科、手术室和急诊室使用的显示屏图像的最大亮度和对比度。约一半的显示屏在低光照条件下符合AAPM的最低亮度和对比度标准。在环境光下,没有一个系统符合对比度标准。文中还讨论了提高显示屏性能和进行校准所面临的挑战。