Suppr超能文献

在小腿中使用颤动周期长度百分比作为间距决定因素的双脉冲经胸除颤。

Double pulse transthoracic defibrillation in the calf using percent fibrillation cycle length as spacing determinate.

作者信息

McDaniel W C, Schuder J C, Sweeney R J, Stoeckle H, Zhang Q, Sullivan M, Hogan M C

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA.

出版信息

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1999 Oct;22(10):1440-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1999.tb00347.x.

Abstract

Recent studies have found that when multiple pulses of energy are used for defibrillation with implantable electrodes, the spacing between these pulses is better determined as a percentage of the fibrillation cycle length (CL), rather than as a fixed function of time. Here, this concept is further tested in the transthoracic defibrillation of calves, which are approximately the size of heavy humans. Eleven 90-110 kg calves (101 +/- 6 kg) were used in evaluating the effectiveness in achieving transthoracic ventricular defibrillation of ten double pulse waveforms (two 50 A 4-ms rectangular monopulses) having leading edge-to-edge spacings of 4 ms (a 50 A 8-ms rectangular monopulse) and 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100, 110, 120, 130 percent fibrillation CL, respectively. In each of these waveforms, the total time when 50 A current was flowing (on time) was 8 ms. Our results show an unequivocal adverse interaction between the pulses, when the spacing is around 60%-70% fibrillation CL; but that the two pulses combined to defibrillate as effectively as a single 8-ms pulse when the spacing is around 110%-130% fibrillation CL. Electrocardiographic analysis suggests that the adverse interaction is due to a refibrillation phenomenon. This study confirms that double pulses can interact and have a negative effect on defibrillation efficacy. Our data suggests that the mechanism of this interaction involves the second pulse reinitiating fibrillation when the pulse separation is in a critical range of values. Our results are also compatible with the hypothesis that the spacing of multiple pulses is better determined as a percentage of the fibrillation CL than as absolute time, although more study is necessary to fully test this hypothesis.

摘要

最近的研究发现,当使用多个能量脉冲通过植入式电极进行除颤时,这些脉冲之间的间隔最好确定为颤动周期长度(CL)的百分比,而不是作为固定的时间函数。在此,这一概念在小牛的经胸除颤中得到进一步测试,小牛的大小与成年人体重相当。使用11头体重90 - 110千克(101±6千克)的小牛来评估十种双脉冲波形(两个50A、4毫秒矩形单脉冲)实现经胸心室除颤的有效性,这些波形的前沿到前沿间距分别为4毫秒(一个50A、8毫秒矩形单脉冲)以及颤动CL的50%、60%、70%、80%、90%、100%、110%、120%、130%。在每种波形中,50A电流流动的总时间(开启时间)为8毫秒。我们的结果表明,当间隔约为颤动CL的60% - 70%时,脉冲之间存在明确的不良相互作用;但当间隔约为颤动CL的110% - 130%时,两个脉冲联合除颤的效果与单个8毫秒脉冲一样有效。心电图分析表明,这种不良相互作用是由于再颤动现象。本研究证实双脉冲可以相互作用并对除颤效果产生负面影响。我们的数据表明,这种相互作用的机制涉及当脉冲间隔处于临界值范围时,第二个脉冲重新引发颤动。我们的结果也与以下假设相符,即多个脉冲的间隔最好确定为颤动CL的百分比而非绝对时间,尽管还需要更多研究来充分验证这一假设。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验