Sbordone L, Barone A, Ciaglia R N, Ramaglia L, Iacono V J
Facolta' di Medicina e Chirurgia, Universita' di Pisa, Italy.
J Periodontol. 1999 Nov;70(11):1322-9. doi: 10.1902/jop.1999.70.11.1322.
The purpose of this longitudinal study was to determine the clinical status and the composition of the subgingival microbiota of dental implants and natural teeth in patients with a history of periodontitis.
Twenty-five partially edentulous patients treated for moderate to advanced adult periodontitis and having a total of 42 implants participated in this 3-year study. The assessment of clinical status was done 1, 2, and 3 years after prosthetic loading (T1, T2, and T3, respectively). Clinical parameters evaluated included probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), gingival index (GI), and plaque index (PI). The subgingival microbiota at peri-implant and periodontal sites were analyzed at T1 and T2.
No significant difference in clinical parameters between implants and teeth and within the 2 groups between different time points was observed through the study. PD and CAL measurements of sampled periodontal and peri-implant sites did not show any statistically significant difference through the study and between the 2 groups. PI of sampled periodontal sites showed a statistically significant improvement during the study. From the morphological observation of the subgingival microbiota, a significant difference in the composition of motile rods between implants and teeth was found at T1. There were no differences detected in the subgingival microbiota, culturally identified at peri-implant and periodontal sites for the duration of the study.
In conclusion, implants were colonized by the indigenous periodontal microbiota and were well maintained in patients with a history of periodontitis. No significant association between progressing or non-progressing periodontal or peri-implant sampled sites in terms of loss of attachment and infection with at least one of the searched periodontal pathogens was found, suggesting that the presence of putative periodontopathogens at peri-implant and periodontal sites may not be associated with future attachment loss or implant failure.
这项纵向研究的目的是确定有牙周炎病史患者的牙种植体和天然牙的临床状况以及龈下微生物群的组成。
25名接受中度至重度成人牙周炎治疗且共有42颗种植体的部分缺牙患者参与了这项为期3年的研究。在修复体加载后1年、2年和3年(分别为T1、T2和T3)进行临床状况评估。评估的临床参数包括探诊深度(PD)、临床附着水平(CAL)、牙龈指数(GI)和菌斑指数(PI)。在T1和T2分析种植体周围和牙周部位的龈下微生物群。
在整个研究过程中,未观察到种植体与牙齿之间以及两组不同时间点之间临床参数的显著差异。在整个研究过程中以及两组之间,所采样的牙周和种植体周围部位的PD和CAL测量值均未显示出任何统计学上的显著差异。在研究期间,所采样的牙周部位的PI显示出统计学上的显著改善。从龈下微生物群的形态学观察来看,在T1时发现种植体与牙齿之间的活动杆菌组成存在显著差异。在整个研究期间,在种植体周围和牙周部位通过培养鉴定的龈下微生物群没有差异。
总之,种植体被本地牙周微生物群定植,并在有牙周炎病史的患者中得到良好维持。在附着丧失方面,进展性或非进展性牙周或种植体周围采样部位与至少一种所研究的牙周病原体感染之间未发现显著关联,这表明种植体周围和牙周部位存在假定的牙周病原体可能与未来的附着丧失或种植体失败无关。