Lee K H, Maiden M F, Tanner A C, Weber H P
Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
J Periodontol. 1999 Feb;70(2):131-8. doi: 10.1902/jop.1999.70.2.131.
The long-term survival of dental implants depends, in part, on control of bacterial infection in the peri-implant region. Periodontal pathogens colonized implants symptomatic through infection, whereas the microbiota of successful implants was similar to that of periodontal health. This study examined the impact on the peri-implant microbiota of crown restorations; implant type; length of time of loading; history of implant or periodontal infections; and whether implants replaced single or multiple teeth. It was of particular interest to evaluate implant colonization by species in a newly described red complex of periodontal pathogens, Porphyromonas gingivalis and Bacteroides forsythus.
This study sampled 43 partially edentulous subjects with successfully osseointegrated titanium root-form dental implants. Eighty-one (81) non-submerged and 20 submerged asymptomatic implants, 83 crowned, and 36 uncrowned teeth were sampled from peri-implant or subgingival sites. The microbiota of samples was evaluated using whole genomic DNA probes in a checkerboard assay to 23 subgingival species.
Implants were colonized principally by oral streptococci, capnocytophagae, Veillonella parvula, Peptostreptococcus micros, and Fusobacterium nucleatum. The periodontal species, P. gingivalis, B. forsythus, Prevotella intermedia, Prevotella nigrescens, and Campylobacter rectus were detected in a few subjects. The microbiota around crowned implants and crowned teeth was similar. Streptococcus oralis, P. intermedia, and Selenomonas noxia were elevated in samples from uncrowned teeth compared to crowned teeth and implants. Microbial complexity increased as loading time increased, but colonization by periodontal pathogens, including red complex species, was higher in subjects with previous periodontal disease. No differences were observed in the microbiota of 1- and 2-stage implants, or between implants supporting single or multiple restorations.
While presence of crowns had only a minor impact on the peri-implant microbiota, microbial changes were observed the longer the implants had been in function and in those patients with a history of periodontal or peri-implant infections. A history of periodontitis had a greater impact on the peri-implant microbiota than implant loading time. The major influence on the peri-implant microbiota was, however, the microbiota on remaining teeth. P. gingivalis and B. forsythus, red complex periodontal pathogens, colonized several implants, although all implants were successfully osseointegrated.
牙种植体的长期存活部分取决于种植体周围区域细菌感染的控制。牙周病原体通过感染定植在有症状的种植体上,而成功种植体的微生物群与牙周健康时的微生物群相似。本研究考察了冠修复体、种植体类型、加载时间长短、种植体或牙周感染史以及种植体是替代单颗牙还是多颗牙对种植体周围微生物群的影响。特别令人感兴趣的是评估新描述的牙周病原体红色复合体中的物种,即牙龈卟啉单胞菌和福赛坦氏拟杆菌对种植体的定植情况。
本研究对43例部分牙列缺损且钛根形牙种植体成功骨结合的受试者进行了采样。从种植体周围或龈下部位采集了81颗非潜入式和20颗潜入式无症状种植体、83颗有冠牙和36颗无冠牙的样本。使用全基因组DNA探针通过棋盘法对样本中的微生物群进行评估,检测23种龈下物种。
种植体主要定植的细菌为口腔链球菌、二氧化碳嗜纤维菌、小韦荣球菌、微小消化链球菌和具核梭杆菌。在少数受试者中检测到了牙周物种,如牙龈卟啉单胞菌、福赛坦氏拟杆菌、中间普氏菌、变黑普氏菌和直肠弯曲菌。有冠种植体和有冠牙周围的微生物群相似。与有冠牙和种植体相比,无冠牙样本中的口腔链球菌、中间普氏菌和有害月形单胞菌数量增加。随着加载时间的增加,微生物复杂性增加,但在有牙周疾病史的受试者中,包括红色复合体物种在内的牙周病原体定植情况更高。在1期和2期种植体的微生物群中未观察到差异,在支持单颗或多颗修复体的种植体之间也未观察到差异。
虽然冠的存在对种植体周围微生物群的影响较小,但在种植体功能使用时间越长以及有牙周或种植体周围感染史的患者中观察到了微生物变化。牙周炎病史对种植体周围微生物群的影响大于种植体加载时间。然而,对种植体周围微生物群的主要影响是剩余牙齿上的微生物群。牙龈卟啉单胞菌和福赛坦氏拟杆菌这两种红色复合体牙周病原体定植在几颗种植体上,尽管所有种植体均成功实现了骨结合。