Suppr超能文献

定性方法:它们是什么以及为何要使用它们?

Qualitative methods: what are they and why use them?

作者信息

Sofaer S

机构信息

Robert P. Luciano Professor of Health Care Policy, School of Public Affairs, Baruch College, New York, New York 10010, USA.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 1999 Dec;34(5 Pt 2):1101-18.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To provide an overview of reasons why qualitative methods have been used and can be used in health services and health policy research, to describe a range of specific methods, and to give examples of their application.

DATA SOURCES

Classic and contemporary descriptions of the underpinnings and applications of qualitative research methods and studies that have used such methods to examine important health services and health policy issues.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Qualitative research methods are valuable in providing rich descriptions of complex phenomena; tracking unique or unexpected events; illuminating the experience and interpretation of events by actors with widely differing stakes and roles; giving voice to those whose views are rarely heard; conducting initial explorations to develop theories and to generate and even test hypotheses; and moving toward explanations. Qualitative and quantitative methods can be complementary, used in sequence or in tandem. The best qualitative research is systematic and rigorous, and it seeks to reduce bias and error and to identify evidence that disconfirms initial or emergent hypotheses.

CONCLUSIONS

Qualitative methods have much to contribute to health services and health policy research, especially as such research deals with rapid change and develops a more fully integrated theory base and research agenda. However, the field must build on the best traditions and techniques of qualitative methods and must recognize that special training and experience are essential to the application of these methods.

摘要

目的

概述定性方法已被用于且可用于卫生服务和卫生政策研究的原因,描述一系列具体方法,并举例说明其应用。

数据来源

定性研究方法的基础与应用的经典及当代描述,以及使用此类方法研究重要卫生服务和卫生政策问题的研究。

主要发现

定性研究方法在以下方面具有价值:对复杂现象进行丰富描述;追踪独特或意外事件;阐明利益和角色差异很大的参与者对事件的体验和解读;让那些观点很少被听到的人发声;进行初步探索以发展理论、生成甚至检验假设;以及寻求解释。定性和定量方法可以相互补充,按顺序或同时使用。最佳的定性研究是系统且严谨的,它力求减少偏差和误差,并识别与初始或新出现的假设相矛盾的证据。

结论

定性方法对卫生服务和卫生政策研究有很大贡献,特别是当此类研究应对快速变化并发展出更全面整合的理论基础和研究议程时。然而,该领域必须基于定性方法的最佳传统和技术,并必须认识到特殊培训和经验对于应用这些方法至关重要。

相似文献

1
Qualitative methods: what are they and why use them?
Health Serv Res. 1999 Dec;34(5 Pt 2):1101-18.
2
Qualitative research and the profound grasp of the obvious.
Health Serv Res. 1999 Dec;34(5 Pt 2):1119-36.
3
Qualitative studies. Their role in medical research.
Can Fam Physician. 1998 Nov;44:2453-8.
4
Qualitative research methods: key features and insights gained from use in infection prevention research.
Am J Infect Control. 2008 Dec;36(10):764-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2008.03.010. Epub 2008 Oct 3.
6
Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis.
Health Serv Res. 1999 Dec;34(5 Pt 2):1189-208.
8
A hierarchy of evidence for assessing qualitative health research.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Jan;60(1):43-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.014. Epub 2006 Sep 28.

引用本文的文献

4
Towards a Greater Understanding of the Role of the Environment: A Systematic Review of Qualitative MZ Twin Differences Studies.
Behav Genet. 2025 May;55(3):153-168. doi: 10.1007/s10519-025-10217-1. Epub 2025 Feb 23.
6
Independence with others: Lessons for anthropology from postdocs in team science.
Hum Organ. 2024 Dec 2;83(4):413-425. doi: 10.1080/00187259.2024.2417197.
8
Clinical genetic services in the Emilia-Romagna region, Italy: current activity and open issues: a mixed-method study.
J Community Genet. 2025 Apr;16(2):139-150. doi: 10.1007/s12687-024-00750-7. Epub 2025 Jan 11.
9
Barriers and facilitators to implementing comprehensive sex education in Texas public schools: A qualitative study.
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 2;20(1):e0316329. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316329. eCollection 2025.
10
"…but I know something's not right here": Exploring the diagnosis and disclosure experiences of persons living with ALS.
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 2;19(12):e0301249. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301249. eCollection 2024.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验