Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1999 Dec;56(12):1088-96. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.56.12.1088.
Intent-to-treat analyses of the study revealed that medication management, alone or combined with intensive behavioral treatment, was superior to behavioral treatment and community care in reducing attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms; but only combined treatment showed consistently greater benefit than community care across other outcome domains (disruptive and internalizing symptoms, achievement, parent-child relations, and social skills). We examine response patterns in subgroups defined by baseline variables (moderators) or variables related to treatment implementation (mediators).
We reconducted random-effects regression (RR) analyses, adding factors defined by moderators (sex, prior medication use, comorbid disruptive or anxiety disorder, and public assistance) and a mediator (treatment acceptance/attendance).
Study outcomes (N = 579) were upheld in most moderator subgroups (boys and girls, children with and without prior medication, children with and without comorbid disruptive disorders). Comorbid anxiety disorder did moderate outcome; in participants without anxiety, results paralleled intent-to-treat findings. For those with anxiety disorders, however, behavioral treatment yielded significantly better outcomes than community care (and was no longer statistically different from medication management and combined treatment) regarding ADHD-related and internalizing symptoms. In families receiving public assistance, medication management yielded decreased closeness in parent-child interactions, and combined treatment yielded relatively greater benefits for teacher-reported social skills. In families with high treatment acceptance/attendance, intent-to-treat results were upheld. Acceptance/attendance was particularly important for medication treatments. Finally, two thirds of children given community care received stimulants. Behavioral treatment did not significantly differ from, but medication management was superior to, this subgroup.
Exploratory analyses revealed that our study (the Multimodal Treatment Study of Children With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder [MTA]) results were confirmed across most baseline variables and treatment acceptance/attendance. In children with ADHD plus anxiety, behavioral treatment surpassed community care and approached medication-based treatments regarding parent-reported ADHD symptoms.
该研究的意向性分析表明,药物管理单独使用或与强化行为治疗相结合,在减轻注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)症状方面优于行为治疗和社区护理;但只有联合治疗在其他结果领域(破坏性行为和内化症状、学业成绩、亲子关系和社交技能)始终显示出比社区护理更大的益处。我们研究了由基线变量(调节因素)或与治疗实施相关的变量(中介因素)定义的亚组中的反应模式。
我们重新进行了随机效应回归(RR)分析,加入了由调节因素(性别、既往用药情况、共病破坏性行为或焦虑症以及公共援助)定义的因素和一个中介因素(治疗接受度/出勤率)。
在大多数调节因素亚组(男孩和女孩、有和没有既往用药的儿童、有和没有共病破坏性行为障碍的儿童)中,研究结果(N = 579)得到了支持。共病焦虑症确实对结果有调节作用;在没有焦虑症的参与者中,结果与意向性分析结果相似。然而,对于那些患有焦虑症的人,在ADHD相关症状和内化症状方面,行为治疗产生的结果明显优于社区护理(并且在统计学上与药物管理和联合治疗不再有差异)。在接受公共援助的家庭中,药物管理导致亲子互动中的亲密程度降低,而联合治疗在教师报告的社交技能方面产生了相对更大的益处。在治疗接受度/出勤率高的家庭中,意向性分析结果得到了支持。接受度/出勤率对药物治疗尤为重要。最后,接受社区护理的儿童中有三分之二接受了兴奋剂治疗。行为治疗与该亚组没有显著差异,但药物管理优于该亚组。
探索性分析表明,我们的研究(注意力缺陷/多动障碍儿童多模式治疗研究 [MTA])结果在大多数基线变量和治疗接受度/出勤率方面得到了证实。在患有ADHD加焦虑症的儿童中,就家长报告的ADHD症状而言,行为治疗超过了社区护理,并且接近基于药物的治疗。