Trnka H, Zenz P, Zembsch A, Easley M, Ritschl P, Salzer M
Orthopädisches Krankenhaus Gersthof, Wielemansgasse 28, A-1180 Vienna, Austria
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1999 Nov 15;119(7/8):456-460.
We included in a prospective study of a standardized indomethacin protocol 134 consecutive patients undergoing primary cementless endoprosthetic hip replacement between January and June 1990. Periarticular heterotopic ossification (HO) was graded according to the Arcq classification (grades 0 to III). At final follow-up, all patients were analyzed clinically and radiographically for HO and aseptic loosening. A similar group of 44 patients (mean age of 64 years, range 38-82 years) undergoing total hip replacement (THR) with the same prosthesis and technique in 1987 did not receive HO prophylaxis and served as a control group. The average age of the 134 prophylaxis patients was 66.5 years (range 32-85 years), and the average follow-up was 65 months (range 60-71 months). Thirty patients (25%) were lost to final follow-up (19 died, 10 unknown, 1 amputation). In the study group, 77% had HO grade 0, while none had HO grade III, compared with 18% HO grade 0 and 16% HO grade III in the control goup. These differences were statistically significant (P = < 0.001). At a minimum of 60 months follow-up, clinical and radiographic evaluation revealed no aseptic loosening in the study group: 4 cases of prosthesis subsidence during the first year did not progress. In the control group, there was a higher incidence of radiolucency around the femoral component, and one patient met all criteria for radiographic evidence of aseptic loosening. Statistical analysis revealed no significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.104). Based on our clinical and radiological results, indomethacin does not inhibit stable bony integration of the femoral component.
我们将1990年1月至6月期间连续接受初次非骨水泥型人工髋关节置换术的134例患者纳入一项关于标准化吲哚美辛方案的前瞻性研究。根据Arcq分类法(0至III级)对关节周围异位骨化(HO)进行分级。在末次随访时,对所有患者进行HO和无菌性松动的临床及影像学分析。1987年一组44例(平均年龄64岁,范围38 - 82岁)接受相同假体和技术的全髋关节置换术(THR)的患者未接受HO预防措施,作为对照组。134例预防组患者的平均年龄为66.5岁(范围32 - 85岁),平均随访时间为65个月(范围60 - 71个月)。30例患者(25%)失访(19例死亡,10例失访原因不明,1例截肢)。研究组中,77%为0级HO,无III级HO,而对照组中0级HO为18%,III级HO为16%。这些差异具有统计学意义(P = < 0.001)。在至少60个月的随访中,临床及影像学评估显示研究组无无菌性松动:第一年有4例假体下沉未进展。对照组中,股骨部件周围透亮区的发生率较高,1例患者符合无菌性松动影像学证据的所有标准。统计学分析显示两组之间无显著差异(P = 0.104)。基于我们的临床和放射学结果,吲哚美辛不抑制股骨部件的稳定骨整合。