• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Sterilization and its consequences.

作者信息

Hendrix N W, Chauhan S P, Morrison J C

机构信息

Spartanburg Regional Medical Center, South Carolina, USA.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1999 Dec;54(12):766-77. doi: 10.1097/00006254-199912000-00005.

DOI:10.1097/00006254-199912000-00005
PMID:10596397
Abstract

UNLABELLED

The purpose of this review is to analyze critically the two techniques of sterilization (bilateral tubal ligation [BTL] and vasectomy) so that a physician may provide informed consent about methods of sterilization. A MEDLINE search and extensive review of published literature dating back to 1966 was undertaken to compare preoperative counseling, operative procedures, postoperative complications, procedure-related costs, psychosocial consequences, and feasibility of reversal between BTL and a vasectomy. Compared with a vasectomy, BTL is 20 times more likely to have major complications, 10 to 37 times more likely to fail, and cost three times as much. Moreover, the procedure-related mortality, although rare, is 12 times higher with sterilization of the woman than of the man. Despite these advantages, 300,000 more BTLs were done in 1987 than vasectomies. In 1987, there were 976,000 sterilizations (65 percent BTLs and 35 percent vasectomies) with an overall cost of $1.8 billion. Over $260 million could have been saved if equal numbers of vasectomies and BTLs had been performed, or more than $800 million if 80 percent had been vasectomies, as was the case in 1971. The safest, most efficacious, and least expensive method of sterilization is vasectomy. For these reasons, physicians should recommend vasectomy when providing counseling on sterilization, despite the popularity of BTL.

TARGET AUDIENCE

Obstetricians & Gynecologists, Family Physicians

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After completion of this article, the reader will be able to predict the failure rates and likelihood of successful reversal of tubal ligation and vasectomy; to recall the difference in cost between the two sterilization procedures, and to describe the short-term and long-term complications associated with each of the two methods of sterilization.

摘要

相似文献

1
Sterilization and its consequences.
Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1999 Dec;54(12):766-77. doi: 10.1097/00006254-199912000-00005.
2
The provision of sterilization services by private physicians.私人医生提供的绝育服务。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1985 Sep-Oct;17(5):216-20.
3
Complications of female sterilization: immediate and delayed.女性绝育的并发症:即时和延迟的。
Fertil Steril. 1984 Mar;41(3):337-55. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)47709-5.
4
Bringing men to the table: sterilization can be for him or for her.让男性参与进来:绝育可以是为了他,也可以是为了她。
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Dec;57(4):731-40. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000060.
5
Vasectomy and vasectomy reversal.输精管切除术及输精管复通术。
Br J Urol. 1994 Apr;73(4):337-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1994.tb07592.x.
6
Physician attitudes and practices studied in Sao Paulo, Brazil.在巴西圣保罗对医生的态度和行为进行了研究。
Netw Res Triangle Park N C. 1985 Spring;6(3):4-5.
7
The choice of sterilization procedure among married couples.已婚夫妇绝育程序的选择。
J Fam Pract. 1982 Jan;14(1):27-30.
8
[Voluntary sterilization].[自愿绝育]
Profamilia. 1990 Dec;6(16):56-61.
9
Sterilization: Canadian choices.绝育:加拿大的选择。
CMAJ. 1989 Mar 15;140(6):645-9.
10
Sterilization.灭菌
Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1984 Dec;11(3):603-40.

引用本文的文献

1
Vasectomy in real-world clinical practice: an ideal checklist to improve patient experience and outcomes.现实临床实践中的输精管切除术:一份改善患者体验和结局的理想清单。
Int J Impot Res. 2025 Sep 16. doi: 10.1038/s41443-025-01158-8.
2
The influence of social media on patient and public perception of vasectomy: a narrative review.社交媒体对患者及公众对输精管切除术认知的影响:一项叙述性综述
Int J Impot Res. 2025 Jun 25. doi: 10.1038/s41443-025-01114-6.
3
Vasectomy provider decision-making balancing autonomy and non-maleficence: qualitative interviews with providers.
输精管切除术提供者决策平衡自主权和不伤害原则:对提供者的定性访谈。
Gates Open Res. 2024 Oct 7;7:132. doi: 10.12688/gatesopenres.15036.1. eCollection 2023.
4
Vasectomy Knowledge and Interest Among U.S. Men Who Do Not Intend to Have More Children.美国那些不打算再要孩子的男性对输精管切除术的了解和兴趣。
Am J Mens Health. 2022 May-Jun;16(3):15579883221098574. doi: 10.1177/15579883221098574.
5
Assessing Vasectomy-Related Information on YouTube: An Analysis of the Quality, Understandability, and Actionability of Information.评估 YouTube 上的输精管切除术相关信息:信息质量、可理解性和可操作性分析。
Am J Mens Health. 2022 Mar-Apr;16(2):15579883221094716. doi: 10.1177/15579883221094716.
6
[Vasectomy : Current information].[输精管切除术:当前信息]
Urologe A. 2021 Apr;60(4):523-532. doi: 10.1007/s00120-021-01494-9. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
7
Barriers to Offering Vasectomy at Publicly Funded Family Planning Organizations in Texas.德克萨斯州公共资助的计划生育组织提供输精管切除术的障碍。
Am J Mens Health. 2017 May;11(3):757-766. doi: 10.1177/1557988317694296. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
8
Tubal ligation in Catholic hospitals: a qualitative study of ob-gyns' experiences.天主教医院中的输卵管结扎术:一项关于妇产科医生经历的定性研究。
Contraception. 2014 Oct;90(4):422-8. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.04.015. Epub 2014 May 4.
9
Hysteroscopic tubal sterilization: an evidence-based analysis.宫腔镜输卵管绝育术:基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2013 Oct 1;13(21):1-35. eCollection 2013.
10
Psychosocial implications of tubal ligation in a rural health district: a phenomenological study.农村地区输卵管结扎术的心理社会影响:一项现象学研究。
Reprod Health. 2011 Dec 16;8:38. doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-8-38.