Casadevall M, da Cruz Fresco P, Kortenkamp A
Centre for Toxicology, The School of Pharmacy, London, UK.
Chem Biol Interact. 1999 Nov 30;123(2):117-32. doi: 10.1016/s0009-2797(99)00128-3.
Inside cells chromium(VI) is activated to its ultimate carcinogenic form by reducing agents including glutathione (GSH) and ascorbate (AsA). The precise mechanism by which DNA damaging species are formed is unclear. In earlier in vitro work with isolated DNA we have shown that chromium(VI) in combination with GSH or AsA is able to induce similar numbers of single strand breaks and apurinic/apyrimidinic sites (AP-sites). Moreover, the formation of both lesions followed a similar temporal pattern. It is conceivable that the two forms of DNA damage arise from a common precursor lesion (e.g. hydrogen abstraction at C4' of the DNA sugar moiety) with a partitioning along two pathways, one yielding an AP-site, the other a single strand break (SSB) and a base propenal. The present study is intended to test this hypothesis by analysing whether oxidation products of deoxyribose can be formed in the presence of chromium(VI) and GSH or AsA. It was found that mixtures of chromium(VI) and GSH or AsA were able to oxidise 2-deoxyribose to yield malondialdehyde, which was detected by reaction with thiobarbituric acid. The characteristic pink chromogen, which forms upon reaction with thiobarbituric acid, was also observed with calf thymus DNA as the substrate. In both experimental systems the addition of catalase prevented the formation of deoxyribose breakdown products. Hydroxyl radicals did not seem to be important for the generation of DNA damage as the characteristic modified DNA bases could not be detected by using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. These results lead us to conclude that the formation of SSB during the reductive conversion of chromium(VI) proceeds primarily via hydrogen abstraction from C4'. The observation that Fenton chemistry is not involved in these processes is intriguing and necessitates further research into the ways in which chromium can activate molecular oxygen to form DNA damaging species.
在细胞内,六价铬会被包括谷胱甘肽(GSH)和抗坏血酸(AsA)在内的还原剂激活,转变为其最终致癌形式。DNA损伤物种形成的确切机制尚不清楚。在早期使用分离DNA的体外实验中,我们发现六价铬与GSH或AsA结合能够诱导相似数量的单链断裂和脱嘌呤/脱嘧啶位点(AP位点)。此外,两种损伤的形成遵循相似的时间模式。可以想象,这两种形式的DNA损伤源于一个共同的前体损伤(例如DNA糖部分C4'处的氢提取),并沿着两条途径进行分配,一条产生AP位点,另一条产生单链断裂(SSB)和碱基丙烯醛。本研究旨在通过分析在六价铬和GSH或AsA存在的情况下是否能形成脱氧核糖的氧化产物来检验这一假设。结果发现,六价铬与GSH或AsA的混合物能够氧化2-脱氧核糖生成丙二醛,通过与硫代巴比妥酸反应进行检测。以小牛胸腺DNA为底物时,也观察到了与硫代巴比妥酸反应形成的特征性粉红色色原。在两个实验系统中,添加过氧化氢酶都能阻止脱氧核糖分解产物的形成。由于使用气相色谱-质谱法无法检测到特征性的修饰DNA碱基,羟基自由基似乎对DNA损伤的产生并不重要。这些结果使我们得出结论,六价铬还原转化过程中SSB的形成主要通过从C4'处提取氢来进行。Fenton化学不参与这些过程这一观察结果很有趣,需要进一步研究铬激活分子氧形成DNA损伤物种的方式。