Suppr超能文献

[与1.5倍传统放大X线摄影相比,4倍DIMA直接放大X线摄影对乳腺标本中微钙化的检测]

[Detection of microcalcifications in breast specimens by 4-fold DIMA direct magnification radiography compared to 1.5-fold conventional magnification radiography].

作者信息

Grunert J H, Borchert B, Farber A, Gmelin E

机构信息

Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Zentrum Radiologie, Diagnostische Radiologie II im Krankenhaus Oststadt.

出版信息

Rofo. 1999 Oct;171(4):302-6. doi: 10.1055/s-1999-253.

Abstract

AIMS OF STUDY

The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy of 4-fold magnification breast specimen radiography (direct magnification, DIMA) compared to conventional 1.5-fold magnification radiography in evaluating the presence or absence of carcinoma at the surgical margins by detection of microcalcification.

METHODS

Fifty breast specimens with non-palpable microcalcifications were examined during surgical biopsy using both DIMA (4-fold) and conventional (1.5-fold) magnification specimen radiography. The number of detected microcalcifications of the whole specimen, of an area of 5 mm distance to the margins and of the area of the suspicious cluster of microcalcifications was counted and the results compared with the histological examination as a gold standard.

RESULTS

In 50 specimen 2821 (1305 within 3 mm distance to the margins) microcalcifications were detected with the DIMA mammography technique compared to 1608 (446) microcalcifications with the conventional technique. This increased detection rate by DIMA-magnification radiography was accompanied by a decreased specificity in comparison to the conventional magnification radiography (33.3% DIMA versus 83.3% conventional) regarding the evaluation of presence or absence of carcinoma at the surgical margins. Differentiating the microcalcifications into calcifications belonging to the suspicious cluster and those that are located outside the cluster led to an increase in specificity (83.3% DIMA versus 100% conventional).

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy of breast specimen radiography in evaluating the presence or absence of carcinoma at the surgical margins by detection of microcalcification is not improved by 4-fold magnification radiography (direct magnification, DIMA) compared to conventional 1.5-fold magnification radiography due to an increase in false-positive results. Analysis of the attachment of the microcalcifications to the cluster can improve the specificity.

摘要

研究目的

本研究旨在调查与传统1.5倍放大乳腺X线摄影相比,4倍放大乳腺标本X线摄影(直接放大,DIMA)通过检测微钙化来评估手术切缘有无癌灶的疗效。

方法

在手术活检期间,使用DIMA(4倍)和传统(1.5倍)放大标本X线摄影对50例有不可触及微钙化的乳腺标本进行检查。统计整个标本、距切缘5mm区域以及可疑微钙化簇区域检测到的微钙化数量,并将结果与作为金标准的组织学检查进行比较。

结果

使用DIMA乳腺X线摄影技术在50个标本中检测到2821个微钙化(距切缘3mm范围内有1305个),而传统技术检测到1608个(446个)微钙化。与传统放大乳腺X线摄影相比,DIMA放大乳腺X线摄影检测率的提高伴随着在评估手术切缘有无癌灶时特异性的降低(DIMA为33.3%,传统为83.3%)。将微钙化分为属于可疑簇的钙化和位于簇外的钙化,可提高特异性(DIMA为83.3%,传统为100%)。

结论

与传统1.5倍放大乳腺X线摄影相比,4倍放大乳腺X线摄影(直接放大,DIMA)由于假阳性结果增加,在通过检测微钙化评估手术切缘有无癌灶方面的疗效并未得到改善。对微钙化与簇的附着情况进行分析可提高特异性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验