• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[头孢噻肟在社区获得性肺炎序贯治疗中的应用]

[Cefotaxime in sequential therapy of community acquired pneumonia].

作者信息

Wolska-Goszka L, Petlak A, Słomiński J M

机构信息

Katedra i Klinika Chorób Płuc i Gruźlicy Akademii Medycznej w Gdańsku.

出版信息

Pol Merkur Lekarski. 1999 Sep;7(39):99-101.

PMID:10598482
Abstract

Recent studies indicate clinical value of intra-venous to oral switch therapy. The aim of this study was to analyze our results i.v. Cefotaxime to oral Cefetamet Piroxil switch therapy in lower respiratory tract infections. Group consists 35 patients in whom 27 has bacterial pathogen definitely established. Cefotaxim (Tarcefoksym-Polfa) i.v. has been used for 3-4 days followed with oral Cefetamet Pivoxil (Tarcevis-Polfa). Patients has been treated for 7 days in hospital and then as an out-patients afterwards. Excelent result has been observed in 27 cases (77% of the study group). Mild symptoms of medication intolerance has been observed in 8 patients (23% of all patients). Results of our experience with third generation cefalosporin i.v. to oral switch therapy are satisfactory. This method reduced total cost of treatment, reduced in-hospital days and was very well accepted by patients.

摘要

近期研究表明静脉转口服序贯疗法具有临床价值。本研究的目的是分析我们在治疗下呼吸道感染时,静脉使用头孢噻肟后转为口服头孢他美酯的治疗结果。该组包括35例患者,其中27例已明确确定有细菌病原体。静脉注射头孢噻肟(Tarcefoksym - Polfa)3 - 4天,随后口服头孢他美酯(Tarcevis - Polfa)。患者在医院接受7天治疗,之后作为门诊患者继续治疗。27例(占研究组的77%)观察到极佳效果。8例患者(占所有患者的23%)观察到轻微的药物不耐受症状。我们使用第三代头孢菌素静脉转口服序贯疗法的经验结果令人满意。这种方法降低了治疗总成本,减少了住院天数,并且患者接受度很高。

相似文献

1
[Cefotaxime in sequential therapy of community acquired pneumonia].[头孢噻肟在社区获得性肺炎序贯治疗中的应用]
Pol Merkur Lekarski. 1999 Sep;7(39):99-101.
2
The efficacy of cefditoren pivoxil in the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections, with a focus on the per-pathogen bacteriologic response in infections caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae: a pooled analysis of seven clinical trials.头孢托仑匹酯治疗下呼吸道感染的疗效,重点关注肺炎链球菌和流感嗜血杆菌所致感染中按病原体的细菌学反应:七项临床试验的汇总分析
Clin Ther. 2006 Dec;28(12):2061-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.12.010.
3
[Cost-effectiveness analysis of ceftriaxone and cefotaxime in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia].
Rev Invest Clin. 2000 Jul-Aug;52(4):418-26.
4
Treatment with sequential intravenous or oral moxifloxacin was associated with faster clinical improvement than was standard therapy for hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia who received initial parenteral therapy.对于接受初始肠外治疗的社区获得性肺炎住院患者,序贯静脉或口服莫西沙星治疗比标准治疗临床改善更快。
Clin Infect Dis. 2005 Dec 15;41(12):1697-705. doi: 10.1086/498149. Epub 2005 Nov 10.
5
The use of cefotaxime for the treatment of common infections: in vitro, pharmacokinetic and clinical considerations.头孢噻肟用于常见感染治疗:体外研究、药代动力学及临床考量
J Chemother. 1997 May;9 Suppl 2:5-18.
6
[Community acquired pneumonia: from intravenous to oral cephalosporin sequential therapy].[社区获得性肺炎:从静脉用头孢菌素序贯治疗到口服治疗]
Rev Med Chil. 2000 Mar;128(3):267-72.
7
[Levofloxacin versus beta-lactamic therapy in community acquired pneumonia that requires hospitalization].
An Med Interna. 2002 Dec;19(12):621-5.
8
Cost-effectiveness of ceftriaxone in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in adult hospital patients.
S Afr Med J. 1998 Sep;88(9):1046, 1048; author reply 1050-1.
9
[Comparative assessment of efficacy of the 3d generation cephalosporins, ceftriabol, and claforan, in patients with community-acquired pneumonia].
Klin Med (Mosk). 2009;87(7):53-5.
10
The choice of antibacterial drugs.抗菌药物的选择。
Med Lett Drugs Ther. 1998 Mar 27;40(1023):33-42.